​

​

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

​

FORM 10-K

​

☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

​

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024

​

or

​

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

​

Commission File Number 001-38955

​

HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

​

​

​

​

(508) 895-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

​

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

​

​

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None  

​

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

​

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

​

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

​

​

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

​

​

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.  ☐

​

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).  ☐

​

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

​

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of its last completed second fiscal quarter was $365,680,424

​

As of February 28, 2025, there were 43,497,648 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.

​

​

​

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

​

Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the Registrant’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.

​

​

​

Index

​

​

​

​

​

​

Glossary of Acronyms and Terms

​

The following is a list of common acronyms and terms used regularly in our financial reporting:

​

​

HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. is referred to as “we,” “our,” “us,” “HarborOne Bancorp” or the “Company.”

3

Forward-Looking Statements

​

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, which are based on certain current assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “potential,” “developments,” “strategic,” “launching,” “opportunities,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “believes,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “targets” and similar expressions. These statements include, among others, statements regarding our strategy, goals and expectations; evaluations of future interest rate trends and liquidity; expectations as to growth in assets, deposits and results of operations, future operations, market position and financial position; and prospects, plans and objectives of management. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. You should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because they are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control.

Forward-looking statements are based on the current assumptions and beliefs of management and are only expectations of future results. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among others, factors referenced under the section captioned “Risk Factors” at Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K; changes in interest rates, changes in general business and economic conditions (including inflation) on a national basis and in the local markets in which the Company operates, including changes that adversely affect borrowers’ ability to service and repay the Company’s loans, changes in customer behavior, ongoing turbulence in the capital and debt markets and the impact of such conditions on the Company’s business activities, increases in loan default and charge-off rates, decreases in the value of securities in the Company’s investment portfolio, fluctuations in real estate values, the possibility that future credit losses may be higher than currently expected due to changes in economic assumptions, customer behavior or adverse economic developments, the adequacy of reserves for credit losses, decreases in deposit levels necessitating increased borrowing to fund loans and investments, competitive pressures from other financial institutions, acquisitions may not produce results at levels or within time frames originally anticipated, cybersecurity incidents, fraud, natural disasters, war, terrorism, civil unrest, and pandemics, changes in regulation, changes in accounting standards and practices, the risk that goodwill and intangibles recorded in the Company’s financial statements will become impaired, demand for loans in the Company’s market area, the Company’s ability to attract and maintain deposits, risks related to the implementation of acquisitions, dispositions, and restructurings, the risk that the Company may not be successful in the implementation of its business strategy; and changes in assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

​

PART I

​

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

​

HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.

​

HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (hereafter referred to as “we,” “our,” “us,” “HarborOne Bancorp” or the “Company”) is a Massachusetts corporation formed in 2016 as a bank holding company, headquartered in Brockton, Massachusetts. The Company owns all of the outstanding stock of HarborOne Bank (the “Bank”), a Massachusetts trust company. At December 31, 2024, the Company had total assets of $5.75 billion, deposits of $4.55 billion, and stockholders’ equity of $575.0 million on a consolidated basis.

​

The Consolidated Financial Statements included herein include the accounts of the Company; the Company’s subsidiaries, Legion Parkway Company LLC (a security corporation) and HarborOne Bank; and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, which consist of HarborOne Mortgage,  HarborOne Security Company, Inc., and a passive investment corporation. The passive investment corporation maintains and manages certain assets of the Bank. HarborOne Security Company, Inc. was established for the purpose of buying, holding and selling securities on its own behalf. The Company has a charitable foundation, The HarborOne Foundation.

​

HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.’s corporate offices are located at 770 Oak Street, Brockton, Massachusetts 02301, and its telephone number is (508) 895-1000.

​

4

HarborOne Bank

​

HarborOne Bank is a state-chartered trust company that was originally established in 1917 as a state-chartered credit union. The Bank provides a variety of financial services to individuals and businesses online and through its 30 full-service branches located in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and commercial lending offices in each of Boston, Massachusetts and Providence, Rhode Island. The Bank also provides a range of educational services through “HarborOne U,” with free digital content, webinars, and recordings for small business and personal financial education.

​

HarborOne Mortgage

​

HarborOne Mortgage, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, is a residential mortgage company headquartered in New Hampshire that maintains offices in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Maine, New Jersey, and Florida, and is licensed to lend in five additional states.

​

Employees and Human Capital Resources

​

As of December 31, 2024, the Company had 535 full-time-equivalent employees. None of the Company’s employees are represented by a labor union, and Management considers its relationship with employees to be good. The Company is an equal opportunity employer. We strive to create an inclusive environment and are dedicated to recruiting, developing and promoting a  workforce to meet the current and future demands of our business.

​

The success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our employees and accordingly, we are committed to their health, safety, and wellness. We promote the health and wellness of our employees by encouraging work-life balance, sponsoring various wellness programs, and offering flexible scheduling. We encourage and support the growth and development of our employees and empower them by providing continual learning and career development, ongoing performance and development conversations, internally developed training programs, customized corporate training engagements, and educational reimbursement programs. The Company engages all employees through the One Experience initiative and committee. We believe our ability to attract, develop and retain employees is a key to the Company’s success. Accordingly, we strive to offer competitive salaries and employee benefits to all employees and monitor salaries in our market areas.

​

Available Information

​

Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. is required to file reports, proxy and information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company electronically files its annual report on Form 10-K, proxy materials, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K and other reports as required with the SEC. The SEC website, at www.sec.gov provides access to all forms which have been filed electronically. Additionally, the Company’s SEC filings including exhibits and amendments, and additional shareholder information are available free of charge on the Company’s website, www.harborone.com (within the Investor Relations section) as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website is not and should not be considered part of this annual report.

​

The Company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “HONE.”

​

5

Market Area and Competition

​

HarborOne Bank. The Bank provides financial services to individuals, families, small and mid-size businesses and municipalities throughout Eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island. While our primary deposit-gathering area is concentrated within our branch office communities and surrounding cities and towns, our lending area encompasses the broader New England market.

​

The Bank faces significant competition for deposits and loans. Our most direct competition for deposits primarily comes from banking institutions and credit unions operating in our market area and internet banks, as well as from nonbank institutions that offer financial alternatives such as securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, and other non-bank financial services and financial technology companies. Competitive factors considered in attracting and retaining deposits include deposit rates, brand awareness, liquidity and market risk, convenient branch locations and hours of operation, personalized customer service, online and mobile access to accounts and automated teller machines, among other factors.

​

Our competition for loans comes from banking institutions, including credit unions, from other financial service providers, and from non-depository financial service companies, such as insurance companies and specialty finance companies. Competitive factors considered for loan generation include interest rates, terms offered, loan fees charged, loan products offered, services provided, geographic locations and a simplified application process.

.

HarborOne Mortgage, LLC. HarborOne Mortgage maintains offices in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Maine, New Jersey, and Florida, and is licensed to lend in five additional states, with 93% of its 2024 originations in New England. HarborOne Mortgage faces competition for originating loans both directly within the markets in which it operates and from entities that provide services throughout the United States through internet channels. HarborOne Mortgage’s competition comes principally from other mortgage banking firms, as well as from commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions, and non-bank financial services and financial technology companies.

​

The Company’s market area is attractive and we expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, have lowered barriers to entry, allowed banks and other financial services companies to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the internet, and made it possible for non-depository institutions to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Increased competition for deposits and the origination of loans could impact the Company’s growth or profitability.

​

Lending Activities

​

Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales. Loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary source of loan originations are our loan originators, and to a lesser extent, advertising and referrals from customers. We purchase participation interests in commercial loans and we sell participation interests in commercial loans to local financial institutions, primarily the portion of loans that exceed our borrowing limits or are in an amount that is considered prudent to manage our credit risk.

​

Mortgage Banking Activity. We originate residential mortgage loans through HarborOne Mortgage. HarborOne Mortgage sells loans on both a servicing-released and a servicing-retained basis. Loans sold with servicing retained are generally serviced by a third party. HarborOne Bank purchases residential mortgage loans for its portfolio from HarborOne Mortgage. These purchases generally consist of jumbo mortgages, adjustable-rate mortgages, and other nonconforming mortgages. The Bank’s decision to purchase loans from HarborOne Mortgage is based on prevailing market interest rate conditions, interest rate risk management, and balance sheet management.

​

Loan Approval Procedures and Authority.  Our lending activities follow written, nondiscriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our Board of Directors and Management. Our Board of Directors has granted loan approval authority to certain executive officers. Commercial loans in excess of any officer’s individual authority must be approved by the Commercial Loan Committee, which is comprised of several executive officers and reviews all commercial and industrial loan requests greater than $10.0 million and commercial real estate loan requests greater than $10.0 million.

​

Loans-to-One Borrower Limit.  The maximum amount that the Bank may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is generally limited, by statute, to 20.0% of the Bank’s capital, which is defined under Massachusetts law as the sum of the Bank’s capital stock, surplus account and undivided profits. At December 31, 2024, the Bank’s regulatory limit on loans to one borrower was $117.6 million. At that date, our largest lending relationship, a 146-unit market-rate apartment building, had a book value of $40.9 million. This loan was performing in accordance with its original repayment terms at December 31, 2024. Our internal loans-to-one- borrower limit is $85.0 million for commercial real estate loans and $30.0 million for commercial and industrial loans.

6

​

The Bank’s total loan portfolio was $4.85 billion on December 31, 2024, or 84.3% of total assets, and included the loan categories below.

​

Commercial Real Estate Loans.  Our largest loan type is loans secured by commercial real estate, representing 47.0% of total loans at December 31, 2024. This portfolio is well-diversified with loans secured by industrial and warehouse facilities, apartment buildings, hospitality facilities, retail developments, healthcare facilities and office buildings.

​

Select Commercial Real Estate Portfolio Statistics as of December 31, 2024

​

​

We currently focus our commercial real estate efforts on small- and mid-size owner occupants and investors in our market area seeking loans between $350,000 and $30.0 million. We originate fixed- and adjustable-rate commercial real estate loans typically with terms between 10 and 15 years. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans typically adjust every 30 days in accordance with a designated index and amortize over a 25- to 30-year term. We also offer interest rate swaps to accommodate customer needs. Loan amounts generally do not exceed 75% of the property’s appraised value at the time the loan is originated.

​

We consider a number of factors when underwriting commercial real estate loans that include projected net cash flow to the loan’s debt service requirement, the age and condition of the collateral, the profitability and the value of the underlying property, the financial resources and income level of the sponsor and their experience in owning or managing similar properties, and the borrower’s credit history. When circumstances warrant, personal guarantees are obtained from the principals of the borrower on commercial real estate. To monitor cash flows on income properties, we require borrowers and loan guarantors, where applicable, to provide annual financial statements and we also generally require an independent appraisal or valuation, an environmental survey, and a property condition report for commercial real estate loans.

​

Of primary concern in commercial real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential of the project. In addition, our commercial borrowers may have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one- to four-family residential mortgage loan. The repayment experience, particularly on nonowner-occupied commercial real estate, is largely dependent on the successful operation of the collateral property, which can be significantly impacted by prevailing economic conditions that may affect the tenancy of the property or the supply and demand for the property type. If we are forced to foreclose on a commercial real estate property due to default, we may not be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs.

​

In the ordinary course of business, when we deem it prudent to share the risk with another lending institution, we participate out a portion of the loan. We were the lead bank in commercial real estate loans of $699.5 million with participation balances out that totaled $300.2 million at December 31, 2024.

​

We also purchase participation interests from other financial institutions generally in our market area. Such participations are evaluated with the same level of due diligence and care as loans we originate. The participations are underwritten, reviewed for compliance, and approved in accordance with our underwriting policies and criteria. We actively monitor the performance of such loans and periodically receive updated financial statements of the borrower from the lead lender in accordance with loan reporting requirements and covenant testing. These loans are reviewed annually in accordance with our loan policy and graded based on credit risk. Loan grades assigned are also tested by the Company’s external loan review firm in accordance with the Company’s loan review policy. We participated in commercial real estate loans with outstanding balances of $305.1 million at December 31, 2024.

Commercial and Industrial Loans.  Commercial and industrial loans represent 12.2% of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2024. We originate commercial and industrial loans and lines of credit to a variety of professionals, sole proprietorships and small-

7

to medium-sized privately held businesses, primarily in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, with sales typically up to $100.0 million and borrowing needs up to $30.0 million, for working capital and other business purposes. Our small business lending team generates small business loans, including loans originated through the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”), which provide a partial government guarantee. Small business loans, including real estate loans, generally consist of loans to businesses with commercial credit needs of less than or equal to $3.0 million and revenues of less than $5.0 million.

​

Select Commercial and Industrial  Loan Portfolio Statistics as of December 31, 2024

​

​

Commercial and industrial loans are originated with either variable or fixed rates of interest. Variable rates are based on a margin over a SOFR index, or the Prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal, plus a margin. Fixed-rate business loans are generally indexed to a corresponding FHLB rate, plus a margin. Commercial and industrial loans typically have shorter maturity terms and higher interest spreads than real estate loans but generally involve more credit risk because of the type and nature of the collateral. We generally require that our commercial customers maintain a deposit relationship with the Bank.

​

When making commercial and industrial loans, we consider the financial statements and the experience of the borrower, our lending history with the borrower, the debt service capabilities of the borrower, the projected cash flows of the business, the value of the collateral, primarily accounts receivable, inventory and equipment and recourse from principal owners. Commercial and industrial loan amounts are determined based on the capacity for debt service and an evaluation of the age, condition and collectability of the collateral, but generally, advance rates for certain asset classes would not exceed 80%. Commercial and industrial loans may present a greater degree of risk  because they depend substantially on the success of the business itself and any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, and may fluctuate in value.

​

In addition to originating these loans, we participate in commercial and industrial loans with other financial institutions located primarily in Massachusetts and Rhode Island and sell participation interests in commercial and industrial loans to local financial institutions, in an amount that is considered prudent to manage our credit risk. At December 31, 2024, we were the lead bank in commercial and industrial loans of $149.5 million with participation balances out that totaled $65.2 million and we participated in commercial and industrial loans with outstanding balances of $53.2 million.

​

Commercial Construction Loans. We originate commercial construction loans for commercial development projects, including industrial buildings, retail and office buildings, and speculative residential real estate. At December 31, 2024, construction loan balances were 5.2% of total loans.

​

Select Commercial Real Estate Construction Portfolio Statistics as of December 31, 2024

​

8

Our commercial construction loans generally call for the payment of interest only with interest rates tied to a SOFR index or the Prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal, plus a margin. Our construction loans for commercial real estate projects can be originated with principal balances of up to $30.0 million, but generally their principal balances are lower. Advances on commercial construction loans are made in accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction, and repayment is generally expected from permanent financing upon completion of construction.

​

Commercial construction lending involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest and as such construction financing is considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If we are forced to foreclose on a project before or at completion due to a default, we may not be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs.

​

At December 31, 2024, we were the lead bank in commercial construction loans of $167.0 million with participation balances out that totaled $66.0 million and we participated in commercial construction loans with outstanding balances of $54.6 million.

​

Loans to consumers. Our loans to consumers consists of real estate loans comprised of residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines, all secured by one-to four-family residential properties, as well as other consumer loans such as auto loans and personal lines of credit. We provide residential real estate mortgages through HarborOne Mortgage for home purchase or refinancing of existing homes, most of which serve as the primary residence of the owner.

​

Select Loans to Consumers Portfolio Statistics as of December 31, 2024

​

​

The majority of conforming fixed-rate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans originated by HarborOne Mortgage are sold on the secondary market to private investors, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae. Generally, we sell loans to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae with servicing retained. The Bank retains in its portfolio jumbo loans, nonconforming loans, and adjustable-rate loans. Our decision to sell loans is based on prevailing market interest rate conditions and interest rate risk management.

​

Our adjustable-rate mortgage loans generally adjust semi-annually or annually after an initial fixed period up to ten years and are adjusted to a rate equal to a specified percentage above an index. Depending on the loan type, the maximum amount by which the interest rate may be increased or decreased is generally 2.0% per adjustment period, with the lifetime interest rate caps up to 6.0% over the initial interest rate of the loan. We originate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios up to 80%, and we generally require private mortgage insurance for residential loans secured by a first mortgage with a loan-to-value ratio over 80%. Additionally we generally require all properties securing mortgage loans to be appraised by a licensed real estate appraiser and require title insurance on all first mortgage loans. Exceptions to these lending policies are based on an evaluation of credit risk related to the borrower and the size of the loan. Borrowers must obtain hazard insurance, and flood insurance is required for loans on properties located in a flood zone.

​

We offer second mortgages and equity lines of credit, which are secured by owner-occupied residences. Equity lines of credit have adjustable rates of interest that are indexed to the Prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal, plus or minus a margin, and generally are subject to an interest rate floor, with ten-year draws and repayment terms up to 20 years. We offer second mortgages and equity lines of credit with cumulative loan-to-value ratios generally up to 80%. We hold a first mortgage position on the homes that secure equity lines of credit in approximately one-third of the portfolio.

​

We originate residential real estate construction loans through HarborOne Mortgage to finance the construction of residential dwellings. Our residential real estate construction loans generally are fixed-rate loans that provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is usually 12 to 36 months. At the end of the construction phase, the loan may be paid in full or converted to a permanent mortgage loan.

​

9

In a low interest rate environment, borrowers generally prefer fixed-rate loans which adversely impacts our net interest income. Adjustable-rate loans may better offset the adverse effects on our net interest income, as compared to fixed-rate loans, but the increased mortgage payments required of adjustable-rate loans in a rising interest rate environment could cause an increase in delinquencies and defaults. If we are forced to foreclose on a residential property due to default, the marketability of the underlying property also may be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment, and we may not be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs. In addition, although adjustable-rate loans help make our asset base more responsive to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is limited by the annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits.

​

Other consumer loans consist primarily of auto loans, unsecured lines of credit and other personal loans.  Other consumer loans are generally unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly. Other consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

​

​

Investment Activities

​

General.  The goals of our investment policy are to provide and maintain liquidity to meet deposit withdrawal and loan funding needs, to help mitigate interest rate and market risk, to diversify our assets, and to generate a reasonable rate of return on funds within the context of our interest rate and credit risk objectives. Our Board of Directors reviews and approves our investment policy annually. Authority to make investments under the approved investment policy guidelines is delegated to our President, our Chief Financial Officer, or our Treasurer. Investment activity is summarized and reported at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors. We classify the majority of our securities as available-for-sale.

​

We have legal authority to invest in various types of securities, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various GSEs and municipal governments, deposits at the FHLB, certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions, and investment grade corporate bonds. We also are required to maintain an investment in FHLB stock. While we have the authority under applicable law to invest in marketable equity securities and derivative securities, we had no investments in such securities at December 31, 2024.

​

Investment Securities.  At December 31, 2024, our securities portfolio totaled $283.5 million and consisted of the following:

​

U.S. Government and GSE Obligations. At December 31, 2024, we had U.S. government and GSE securities totaling $50.6 million, which constituted 17.8% of our securities portfolio. While these securities generally provide lower yields than other investments in our securities portfolio, we maintain these investments, to the extent we deem appropriate, for liquidity purposes, as collateral for borrowings and for prepayment protection.

​

U.S. Government and Government-Sponsored Mortgage-Backed Securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, or “CMOs.”  At December 31, 2024, we had mortgage-backed securities totaling $225.0 million, which constituted 79.3% of our securities portfolio. Mortgage-backed securities and CMOs are securities issued in the secondary market that are collateralized by pools of residential mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities typically are collateralized by pools of one- to four-family or multi-family mortgages. The interest rate of the security is lower than the interest rates of the underlying loans to allow for payment of servicing and guaranty fees. All of our mortgage-backed securities are either backed by the Government National Mortgage Association, or “Ginnie Mae,” a U.S. government agency, or GSEs, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

​

Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agencies and GSEs are more liquid than individual mortgage loans because there is an active trading market for such securities. In addition, residential mortgage-backed securities may be used to collateralize our borrowings. Investments in residential mortgage-backed securities involve a risk that actual payments will be greater or less than the prepayment rate estimated at the time of purchase, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of any discount relating to such interests, thereby affecting the net yield on our securities. Current prepayment speeds determine whether prepayment estimates require modification that could cause amortization or accretion adjustments.

​

SBA Asset-Backed Securities. At December 31, 2024, we had investments in participation certificates issued and guaranteed by the SBA totaling $6.0 million.

​

Corporate Bonds. At December 31, 2024, we had investments in corporate bonds totaling $1.9 million.

​

10

In addition to our securities portfolio, we also have investments in FHLB stock and bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”).

​

FHLB Stock. In connection with our borrowing activities, we held common stock of the FHLB totaling $23.3 million at December 31, 2024. The FHLB common stock is carried at cost and classified as a restricted equity security. We may be required to purchase additional FHLB stock if we increase FHLB borrowings in the future.

​

BOLI. We invest in BOLI to provide us with a funding source for our benefit plan obligations. BOLI also generally provides us noninterest income that is non-taxable. At December 31, 2024, our balance in BOLI totaled $97.7 million and was issued by seven highly rated insurance companies.

​

Sources of Funds

​

General.  Deposits, borrowings and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions.

​

Deposit Accounts.  At December 31, 2024, total deposits were $4.55 billion. Deposits are attracted from within our market area by sales efforts of our branch network, commercial loan officers, our government banking group, advertising and through our website. We offer a broad selection of deposit instruments, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits (such as checking accounts), interest-bearing demand accounts (such as NOW and money market accounts), savings accounts and term certificates of deposit. We also offer a variety of deposit accounts designed for businesses and municipalities operating in our market area. Our business banking deposit products include a commercial checking account, sweep accounts, money market accounts and checking accounts specifically designed for small businesses. We also offer remote deposit capture products for business customers to meet their online banking needs. Additionally, the Bank has a government banking group that provides core depository services to local municipalities. At December 31, 2024, municipal deposits totaled $519.5 million and consisted of relationships with over 85 cities and towns. The Bank also participates in a reciprocal deposit program that provides access to deposit products insured by the FDIC in aggregate amounts exceeding the current insurance limits for depositors. At December 31, 2024, total reciprocal deposits were $376.3 million and included $266.2 million of municipal deposits.

​

When rates and terms are favorable, the Bank may supplement the customer deposit base with brokered deposits and institutional deposit listing service. At December 31, 2024, we had $401.5 million of brokered deposits, which represented 8.8% of total deposits at December 31, 2024, with such funds having a weighted average remaining term to maturity of approximately four months.

​

Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit, and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, our liquidity needs, profitability to us, and customer preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing on a bi-weekly basis. Our deposit pricing strategy has generally been to offer competitive rates and to periodically offer special rates in order to attract deposits of a specific type or term.

​

Borrowings.  At December 31, 2024, total borrowings were $516.6 million. Borrowings consist of short-term and long-term obligations from the FHLB. The Bank is a member of the FHLB Boston, which provides access to wholesale funding to supplement our supply of investable funds. The FHLB functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for its member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock in the FHLB and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and portions of our loan portfolio identified under a blanket lien, provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under several different programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the FHLB’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. At December 31, 2024, based on available collateral and our ownership of FHLB stock, we had access to additional FHLB advances of up to $656.2 million. All of our borrowings from the FHLB are secured by a blanket lien on residential real estate and commercial real estate loans.

​

The Bank maintains a borrowing line through the FRBB with total credit based on eligible collateral. At December 31, 2024, the Bank had $630.1 million borrowing capacity secured by pledged loans and securities whose collateral value was $364.1 million and $266.0 million, respectively and no outstanding balance on the FRBB line. The Company also has additional borrowing capacity under a $25.0 million unsecured federal funds line with a correspondent bank of which no amount was outstanding at December 31, 2024.

​

​

​

11

Supervision and Regulation

​

General

​

The following discussion addresses elements of the regulatory framework applicable to bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. This regulatory framework is intended primarily to protect the safety and soundness of depository institutions, the federal deposit insurance system, and depositors, rather than the shareholders of a bank holding company such as the Company.

​

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation, examination, and supervision by the Federal Reserve under the BHCA, and by the Commissioner under Massachusetts law.

​

As a state-chartered trust company, the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Commissioner under Massachusetts law. The Bank’s Rhode Island branches are also subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the RI Division of Banking. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. On February 24, 2023, at 5 p.m. local time, the Bank exited the DIF, a private industry-sponsored insurance fund, which insured deposit amounts in excess of the FDIC insurance limits. All customer non-certificate deposits as of that date and time were covered by the DIF insurance for one year until February 24, 2024. Certificates of deposit as of 5 p.m. local time on February 24, 2023 will remain covered by DIF insurance until their maturity date.

The Bank must also comply with consumer protection regulations issued by the CFPB, as enforced by the FDIC. Additionally, under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve may directly examine the subsidiaries of a bank holding company, including the Bank.

​

The following is a summary of certain aspects of the various statutes and regulations applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries. This summary is not a comprehensive analysis of all applicable laws, and it is qualified by reference to the full text of statutes and regulations referenced below.

​

Regulation of the Company

​

General. The Company is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve, which has the authority, among other things, to order bank holding companies to cease and desist from unsafe or unsound banking practices; to assess civil money penalties; and to order termination of non-banking activities or termination of ownership and control of a non-banking subsidiary by a bank holding company.

​

Source of Strength. Under the BHCA, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company is required to serve as a source of financial strength for the Bank. This support may be required at times when the Company may not have the resources to provide support to the Bank. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a bank subsidiary will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment.

​

Acquisitions and Activities. The BHCA prohibits a bank holding company, without prior approval of the Federal Reserve, from acquiring all or substantially all the assets of a bank; acquiring control of a bank; merging or consolidating with another bank holding company; or acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, the acquiring bank holding company would control more than 5% of any class of the voting shares of such other bank or bank holding company.

​

The BHCA also generally prohibits a bank holding company from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or furnishing services to its subsidiary banks. However, among other permitted activities, a bank holding company may engage in and may own shares of companies engaged in, certain activities that the Federal Reserve has determined to be closely related to banking, subject to certain notification requirements.

​

Limitations on Acquisitions of Company Common Stock. The Change in Bank Control Act prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring “control” of a bank holding company unless the Federal Reserve has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under rebuttable presumptions of control established by the Federal Reserve, the acquisition of control of voting securities of a bank holding company constitutes an acquisition of control under the Change in Bank Control Act, requiring prior notice to the Federal Reserve, if, immediately after the transaction, the acquiring person (or persons acting in concert) will own, control, or hold with power to vote 10% or more of any class of voting securities of the bank holding company, and if either (i) the bank holding company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or (ii) no other person will own, control, or hold the power to vote a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. On July 30, 2024, the FDIC approved a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend the FDIC’s rules implementing the Change in Bank Control Act. If adopted, the

12

proposed rule would eliminate an exemption from prior notice to the FDIC for a proposed change in control involving the acquisition of voting securities of a depository institution holding company for which the Federal Reserve reviews a notice pursuant to the Change in Bank Control Act. As a result, if the proposed rule is adopted, the acquisition of control of a bank holding company for an insured state nonmember bank would require prior notice to both the FDIC and the Federal Reserve.

​

In addition, the BHCA prohibits any company from acquiring control of a bank or bank holding company without first having obtained the approval of the Federal Reserve. Among other circumstances, under the BHCA, a company has control of a bank or bank holding company if the company owns, controls or holds with power to vote 25% or more of a class of voting securities of the bank or bank holding company; controls in any manner the election of a majority of directors or trustees of the bank or bank holding company; or the Federal Reserve has determined, after notice and opportunity for hearing, that the company has the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of the bank or bank holding company. The Federal Reserve has established presumptions of control under which the acquisition of control of 5% or more of a class of voting securities of a bank holding company, together with other factors enumerated by the Federal Reserve, could constitute the acquisition of control of a bank holding company for purposes of the BHCA.

​

Regulation of the Bank

​

General. The Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC, the Commissioner, and the RI Division of Banking. The FDIC, the Commissioner, and the RI Division of Banking have the authority to issue orders to banks under their supervision to cease and desist from unsafe or unsound banking practices and violations of laws, regulations, or conditions imposed by, agreements with, or commitments to, the Commissioner, the RI Division of Banking and the FDIC. The Commissioner, the RI Division of Banking and the FDIC are also empowered to assess civil money penalties against companies or individuals who violate banking laws, orders or regulations.

​

Deposit Insurance. Deposit obligations of the Bank are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000 per depositor. Deposit insurance premiums are based on assets. The FDIC calculates deposit insurance assessment rates for established small banks, generally those banks with less than $10 billion of assets that have been insured for at least five years, taking into account various measures, including an institution’s leverage ratio, brokered deposit ratio, one-year asset growth, the ratio of net income before taxes to total assets, and considerations related to asset quality. The FDIC has the authority to adjust deposit insurance assessment rates at any time. In addition, under the FDIA, the FDIC may terminate deposit insurance, among other circumstances, upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. For 2024, the FDIC insurance expense for the Bank was $4.3 million.

​

Acquisitions and Branching. Prior approval from the Commissioner and the FDIC is required in order for the Bank to acquire another bank or establish a new branch office. Well capitalized and well managed banks may acquire other banks in any state, subject to certain deposit concentration limits and other conditions, pursuant to the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes a state-chartered bank, such as the Bank, to establish new branches on an interstate basis to the same extent a bank chartered by the host state may establish branches.

​

Activities and Investments of Insured State-Chartered Banks. The FDIA generally limits the types of equity investments an FDIC-insured state-chartered bank, such as the Bank, may make and the kinds of activities in which such a bank may engage, as a principal, to those that are permissible for national banks. Further, the GLBA permits state banks, to the extent permitted under state law, to engage via financial subsidiaries in certain activities that are permissible for subsidiaries of a financial holding company. In order to form a financial subsidiary, a state-chartered bank must be “well capitalized,” and such banks must comply with certain capital deduction, risk management and affiliate transaction rules, among other requirements.

​

Brokered Deposits. The FDIA and FDIC regulations generally limit the ability of an insured depository institution to accept, renew or roll over any brokered deposit unless the institution’s capital category is “well capitalized” or, with the FDIC’s approval, “adequately capitalized.” Certain depository institutions that have brokered deposits in excess of 10% of total assets are subject to increased FDIC deposit insurance premium assessments; however, for institutions that are “well capitalized” and have a CAMELS composite rating of 1 or 2, reciprocal deposits are deducted from brokered deposits. Section 202 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the “Economic Growth Act”), which was enacted in 2018, amended the FDIA to exempt a capped amount of reciprocal deposits from treatment as brokered deposits for certain insured depository institutions.

​

Community Reinvestment Act. The CRA requires the FDIC to evaluate the Bank’s performance in helping to meet the credit needs of the entire communities it serves, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with its safe and sound banking operations, and to take this record into consideration when evaluating certain applications. The FDIC’s CRA regulations are

13

generally based upon objective criteria of the performance of institutions under three key assessment tests: (i) a lending test, to evaluate the institution’s record of making loans in its service areas; (ii) an investment test, to evaluate the institution’s record of investing in community development projects, affordable housing, and programs benefiting low- or moderate-income individuals and businesses; and (iii) a service test, to evaluate the institution’s delivery of services through its branches, ATMs, and other offices. The Bank has achieved a rating of “Outstanding” on its most recent CRA examination. Massachusetts has also enacted a similar statute that requires the Commissioner to evaluate the performance of the Bank in helping to meet the credit needs of its entire community and to take that record into account in considering certain applications. On October 23, 2023, the FDIC approved changes to its CRA regulations, maintaining the existing CRA ratings (Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve, and Substantial Noncompliance) but modifying the evaluation framework to replace the existing tests generally applicable to banks with at least $2 billion in assets (the lending, investment, and services tests) with four new tests and associated performance metrics. On February 5, 2024, the American Bankers Association, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Independent Community Bankers of America, along with four state trade associations jointly sued the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and Office of Comptroller of the Currency for exceeding their statutory authority in adopting revised regulations to implement the Community Reinvestment Act. The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas requested the regulatory agencies vacate the rule and sought a preliminary injunction pausing the new rules while the court decided the merits of the case. On March 29, 2024, the district court judge granted a temporary injunction to pause the implementation of CRA final rule with respect to the plaintiff trade associations while the case moves forward. The banking agencies have appealed the issuance of the injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. However, the new CRA regulations are currently expected to become effective on January 1, 2026.

Lending Restrictions. Federal law limits a bank’s authority to extend credit to directors and executive officers of the bank or its affiliates and persons or companies that own, control or have power to vote more than 10% of any class of securities of a bank or an affiliate of a bank, as well as to entities controlled by such persons. Among other things, extensions of credit to insiders are required to be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons. The terms of such extensions of credit may not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features and may not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of the bank’s capital.

​

Capital Adequacy and Safety and Soundness

​

Regulatory Capital Requirements. The Federal Reserve and the FDIC have issued substantially similar risk-based and leverage capital rules applicable to U.S. banking organizations such as the Company and the Bank. These rules are intended to reflect the relationship between the banking organization’s capital and the degree of risk associated with its operations based on transactions recorded on-balance sheet as well as off-balance sheet items. The Federal Reserve and the FDIC may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum levels discussed below, due to the banking organization’s financial condition or actual or anticipated growth.

​

The capital adequacy rules define qualifying capital instruments and specify minimum amounts of capital as a percentage of assets that banking organizations are required to maintain. Common equity Tier 1 capital generally includes common stock and related surplus, retained earnings and, in certain cases and subject to certain limitations, minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill, other non-qualifying intangible assets and certain other deductions. Tier 1 capital for banks and bank holding companies generally consists of the sum of common equity Tier 1 capital, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, and related surplus and, in certain cases and subject to limitations, minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries that do not qualify as common equity Tier 1 capital, less certain deductions. Tier 2 capital generally consists of hybrid capital instruments, perpetual debt and mandatory convertible debt securities, cumulative perpetual preferred stock, term subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock, and, subject to limitations, allowances for credit losses. The sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital less certain required deductions represents qualifying total risk-based capital.

​

Under the capital rules, risk-based capital ratios are calculated by dividing common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital, and total capital, respectively, by risk-weighted assets. Assets and off-balance sheet credit equivalents are assigned to one of several categories of risk weights based primarily on relative credit risk. The Tier 1 leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 capital by average assets, less certain items such as goodwill and intangible assets, as permitted under the capital rules.

​

Under the Federal Reserve’s rules that are applicable to the Company and the FDIC’s capital rules applicable to the Bank, the Company and the Bank are each required to maintain a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5%, a minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 6.0%, a minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.0% and a minimum leverage ratio requirement of 4.0%. Additionally, these rules require an institution to establish a capital conservation buffer of common equity Tier 1 capital in an amount above the minimum risk-based capital requirements for “adequately capitalized”

14

institutions of more than 2.5% of total risk weighted assets, or face restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, pay discretionary bonuses, and to engage in share repurchases.

​

Under the FDIC’s prompt corrective action rules, an FDIC-supervised institution is considered well capitalized if it (i) has a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.0% or greater; (ii) a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8.0% or greater; (iii) a common Tier 1 equity ratio of 6.5% or greater, (iv) a leverage capital ratio of 5.0% or greater; and (v) is not subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. The Bank is considered well capitalized under all regulatory definitions.

​

Generally, a bank, upon receiving notice that it is not adequately capitalized (i.e., that it is “undercapitalized”), becomes subject to the prompt corrective action provisions of Section 38 of the FDIA that, for example, (i) restrict payment of capital distributions and management fees, (ii) require that its federal bank regulator monitor the condition of the institution and its efforts to restore its capital, (iii) require submission of a capital restoration plan, (iv) restrict the growth of the institution’s assets and (v) require prior regulatory approval of certain expansion proposals. A bank that is required to submit a capital restoration plan must concurrently submit a performance guarantee by each company that controls the bank. A bank that is “critically undercapitalized” (i.e., has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%) will be subject to further restrictions, and generally will be placed in conservatorship or receivership within 90 days.

​

Current capital rules do not establish standards for determining whether a bank holding company is well capitalized. However, for purposes of processing regulatory applications and notices, the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y provides that a bank holding company is considered “well capitalized” if (i) on a consolidated basis, the bank holding company maintains a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater; (ii) on a consolidated basis, the bank holding company maintains a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater; and (iii) the bank holding company is not subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive issued by the Board of Directors to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. A banking organization that qualifies for and elects to use the community bank leverage framework described below will be considered well capitalized as long as it is not subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive issued by the Board of Directors to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure.

​

Safety and Soundness Standard. Guidelines adopted by the federal bank regulatory agencies pursuant to the FDIA establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings, and compensation and benefits. In general, these guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risk and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the federal banking agencies adopted regulations that authorize, but do not require, an agency to order an institution that has been given notice by an agency that it is not satisfying any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If, after being so notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails in any material respect to implement an acceptable compliance plan, the agency must issue an order restricting asset growth, requiring an institution to increase its ratio of tangible equity to assets or directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an undercapitalized institution is subject under the “prompt corrective action” provisions of the FDIA. See “—Regulatory Capital Requirements” above. If an institution fails to comply with such an order, the agency may seek to enforce such order in judicial proceedings and to impose civil money penalties.

​

Dividend Restrictions

​

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. The revenue of the Company (on a parent-only basis) is derived primarily from dividends paid to it by the Bank and the Company’s other subsidiaries. The right of the Company, and consequently the right of shareholders of the Company, to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of its subsidiaries through the payment of dividends or otherwise is subject to the prior claims of creditors of the subsidiaries, including, with respect to the Bank, depositors of the Bank, except to the extent that certain claims of the Company in a creditor capacity may be recognized.

​

Restrictions on Bank Holding Company Dividends. The Federal Reserve has the authority to prohibit bank holding companies from paying dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice. The Federal Reserve has indicated generally that it may be an unsafe or unsound practice for bank holding companies to pay dividends unless the bank holding company’s net income over the preceding year is sufficient to fund the dividends and the expected rate of earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. Further, under the Federal Reserve’s capital rules, the Company’s ability to

15

pay dividends is restricted if it does not maintain capital above the capital conservation buffer. See “—Capital Adequacy and Safety and Soundness—Regulatory Capital Requirements” above.

​

Restrictions on Bank Dividends. The FDIC has the authority to use its enforcement powers to prohibit a bank from paying dividends if, in its opinion, the payment of dividends would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. Federal law also prohibits the payment of dividends by a bank that will result in the bank failing to meet its applicable capital requirements on a pro forma basis. The payment of dividends by a bank is also restricted pursuant to various state regulatory limitations.

​

Certain Transactions by Bank Holding Companies with their Affiliates

​

There are various statutory restrictions on the extent to which bank holding companies and their non-bank subsidiaries may borrow, obtain credit from or otherwise engage in “covered transactions” with their insured depository institution subsidiaries. An insured depository institution (and its subsidiaries) may not lend money to, or engage in covered transactions with, its non-depository institution affiliates if the aggregate amount of covered transactions outstanding involving the bank, plus the proposed transaction exceeds the following limits: (i) in the case of any one such affiliate, the aggregate amount of covered transactions of the insured depository institution and its subsidiaries cannot exceed 10% of the capital stock and surplus of the insured depository institution; and (ii) in the case of all affiliates, the aggregate amount of covered transactions of the insured depository institution and its subsidiaries cannot exceed 20% of the capital stock and surplus of the insured depository institution. For this purpose, “covered transactions” are defined by statute to include a loan or extension of credit to an affiliate; a purchase of or investment in securities issued by an affiliate; a purchase of assets from an affiliate unless exempted by the Federal Reserve; the acceptance of securities issued by an affiliate as collateral for a loan or extension of credit to any person or company; the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate; securities borrowing or lending transactions with an affiliate that creates a credit exposure to such affiliate; or a derivatives transaction with an affiliate that creates a credit exposure to such affiliate. Covered transactions are also subject to certain collateral security requirements. Covered transactions as well as other types of transactions between a bank and a bank holding company must be conducted under terms and conditions, including credit standards, which are at least as favorable to the bank as prevailing market terms. If a banking organization elects to use the community bank leverage ratio framework described in “Capital Adequacy and Safety and Soundness-Regulatory Capital Requirements” above, the banking organization would be required to measure the amount of covered transactions as a percentage of Tier 1 capital, subject to certain adjustments. Moreover, Section 106 of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 provides that, to further competition, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or sale of property of any kind, or the furnishing of any service.

​

Consumer Protection Regulation

​

The Company and the Bank are subject to federal and state laws designed to protect consumers and prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive business practices, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Housing Act, Home Ownership Protection Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (the “FACT Act”), the GLBA, the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), the CRA, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the National Flood Insurance Act, and various state law counterparts. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must interact with clients when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans, and providing other services. Further, the CFPB also has a broad mandate to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts and practices and is specifically empowered to require certain disclosures to consumers and draft model disclosure forms. Failure to comply with consumer protection laws and regulations can subject financial institutions to enforcement actions, fines and other penalties. The FDIC examines the Bank for compliance with CFPB rules and enforces CFPB rules with respect to the Bank.

​

The Dodd-Frank Act prescribes certain standards that mortgage lenders must consider before making a residential mortgage loan, including verifying a borrower’s ability to repay such mortgage loan, and allows borrowers to assert violations of certain provisions of TILA as a defense to foreclosure proceedings. Additionally, the CFPB’s qualified mortgage rule requires creditors, such as the Bank, to make a reasonable, good faith determination of a consumer’s ability to repay any consumer credit transaction secured by a dwelling prior to making the loan. The Economic Growth Act included provisions that ease certain requirements related to mortgage transactions for certain institutions with less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets.

​

Privacy and Customer Information Security. The GLBA requires financial institutions to implement policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. In general, the Bank must provide its clients with an initial and annual disclosure that explains its policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of such nonpublic personal information, and, except as otherwise required or permitted by law, the Bank is prohibited from disclosing such information unless otherwise provided in such policies and procedures. However, an annual disclosure is not required to be provided by

16

a financial institution if the financial institution only discloses information under exceptions from GLBA that do not require an opt-out to be provided and if there has been no change in its privacy policies and procedures since its most recent disclosure provided to consumers. The GLBA also requires that the Bank develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of client information (as defined under GLBA), to protect against anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information and to protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any client. The Bank is also required to send a notice to clients whose “sensitive information” has been compromised if unauthorized use of the information is “reasonably possible.” All fifty states, as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, have enacted legislation concerning breaches of data security and the duties of the Bank in response to a data breach. In addition, individual states in our market area have promulgated data security regulations with respect to personal information of their residents. Pursuant to the FACT Act, the Bank has developed and implemented a written identity theft prevention program to detect, prevent, and mitigate identity theft in connection with the opening of certain accounts or certain existing accounts. Additionally, the FACT Act amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act to generally prohibit a person from using information received from an affiliate to make a solicitation for marketing purposes to a consumer, unless the consumer is given notice and a reasonable opportunity and a reasonable method to opt out of the making of such solicitations.

​

Anti-Money Laundering

​

The Bank Secrecy Act. Under the BSA, a financial institution is required to have systems in place to detect certain transactions, based on the size and nature of the transaction. Financial institutions are generally required to report to the U.S. Treasury any cash transactions involving more than $10,000. In addition, financial institutions are required to file suspicious activity reports for any transaction or series of transactions that involve at least $5,000 and which the financial institution knows, suspects or has reason to suspect involves illegal funds, is designed to evade the requirements of the BSA or has no lawful purpose. The USA PATRIOT Act, which amended the BSA, together with the implementing regulations of various federal regulatory agencies, has caused financial institutions, such as the Bank, to adopt and implement additional policies or amend existing policies and procedures with respect to, among other things, anti-money laundering compliance, suspicious activity, currency transaction reporting, customer identity verification and customer risk analysis. In evaluating an application to acquire a bank or to merge banks or effect a purchase of assets and assumption of deposits and other liabilities, the applicable federal banking regulator must consider the anti-money laundering compliance record of both the applicant and the target. In addition, under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are required to take steps to monitor their correspondent banking and private banking relationships as well as, if applicable, their relationships with “shell banks.”

​

OFAC. The U.S. has imposed economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign countries, nationals and others. These sanctions, which are administered by OFAC, take many different forms. Generally, however, they contain one or more of the following elements: (i) restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country, including prohibitions against direct or indirect imports from and exports to a sanctioned country and prohibitions on “U.S. persons” engaging in financial or other transactions relating to a sanctioned country, or with certain designated persons and entities; (ii) a blocking of assets in which the government or specially designated nationals of the sanctioned country have an interest, by prohibiting transfers of property subject to U.S. jurisdiction (including property in the possession or control of U.S. persons); and (iii) restrictions on certain transactions with or involving certain persons or entities. Blocked assets (for example, property and bank deposits) cannot be paid out, withdrawn, set off, or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the Company.

​

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

​

Before deciding to invest in us or deciding to maintain or increase your investment, you should carefully consider the risks described below, in addition to the other information contained in this report and in our other filings with the SEC. The risks and uncertainties described below and in our other filings are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business. If any of these known or unknown risks or uncertainties actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed. In that event, the market price for our common stock could decline and you may lose some or all of your investment.

​

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY

​

Inflationary pressures and rising prices may affect our results of operations and financial condition.

​

Inflation continued at elevated levels in 2024 and may remain elevated in 2025. In response to a pronounced rise in inflation, the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate several times in 2023. While the Federal Reserve cut the federal funds rate in 2024, we

17

cannot predict whether or when the Federal Reserve may increase or decrease the federal funds rate in the future. Moreover, while the inflation rate has decreased, prices remain high. Small to medium-sized businesses may be impacted by higher costs as they are not able to leverage economies of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, the ability of our business customers to repay their loans may deteriorate, and in some cases this deterioration may occur quickly. Sustained higher interest rates by the Federal Reserve, changes to fiscal policy, including expansion of U.S. federal deficit spending and resultant debt issuance, could also affect market interest rates, push down asset prices and weaken economic activity. A deterioration in economic conditions in the U.S. and our markets could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values and a decrease in demand for our products and services, any of which, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, continued high market interest rates may reduce our loan origination volume, particularly refinance volume, and/or reduce our interest rate spread, which could have an adverse effect on our profitability and results of operations.

​

Changes in interest rates have hurt and may continue to hurt our results of operations and financial condition.

​

Like other financial institutions, we are subject to interest rate risk. Our primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net interest income by affecting the difference between the weighted-average yield earned on our interest-earning assets and the weighted-average rate paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, or interest rate spread, and the average life of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Conditions such as inflation, deflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, and other factors beyond our control may also affect interest rates.

​

While we pursue an asset/liability strategy designed to mitigate our risk from changes in interest rates, changes in interest rates may still have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Changes in the level of interest rates also may negatively affect our ability to originate and sell loans, the value of our assets and our ability to realize gains from the sale of our assets, all of which ultimately affect our earnings.

​

We may be adversely affected by volatility in U.S. and global economic conditions and changes in fiscal, monetary, trade and regulatory policies.

​

The economy in the U.S. and globally has experienced volatility in recent years and may continue to experience such volatility for the foreseeable future. Unfavorable or uncertain economic conditions can be caused by declines in economic growth, business activity, or investor or business confidence; limitations on the availability of or increases in the cost of credit and capital; increases in inflation or interest rates; uncertainties regarding fiscal and monetary policies; the timing and impact of changing governmental policies, including changes in guidance and interpretation by regulatory authorities; changes in trade policies by the U.S. or other countries, such as tariffs or retaliatory tariffs as those proposed by the current U.S. Administration; supply chain disruptions; consumer spending; employment levels; labor shortages; challenging labor market conditions; wage stagnation; federal government shutdowns; energy prices; home prices; commercial property values; bankruptcies and a default by a significant market participant or class of counterparties; natural disasters; climate change; epidemics; pandemics; terrorist attacks; acts of war; or a combination of these or other factors.

​

Volatile business and economic conditions could have adverse effects on our business, including the following:

​

​

Increased market volatility and adverse changes in financial or capital market conditions may increase our market risk.

​

Our liquidity, competitive position, business, results of operations and financial condition are affected by market risks such as changes in interest rates, fluctuations in equity, commodity and futures prices, the implied volatility of interest rates and credit spreads and other economic and business factors. These market risks may adversely affect, among other things, the value of our securities, the

18

cost of debt capital and our access to credit markets, customer allocation of capital among investment alternatives, and our competitiveness with respect to deposit pricing. In times of market stress or other unforeseen circumstances, previously uncorrelated indicators may become correlated, which may limit the effectiveness of our strategies to manage these risks.

​

Commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans may increase our lending risk.

​

We intend to continue our focus on prudently growing our commercial loan portfolio. At December 31, 2024, our commercial real estate loan portfolio was $2.28 billion, or 47.0% of total loans, and our commercial and industrial loan portfolio was $594.5 million, or 12.3% of total loans. Given their larger balances and the complexity of the underlying collateral, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans generally expose a lender to greater credit risk than loans secured by owner-occupied one- to four-family real estate. Also, many of our borrowers or related groups of borrowers have more than one of these types of loans outstanding. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to significantly greater risk of loss. Payments on loans secured by commercial properties are often dependent on the income produced by the underlying properties which, in turn, depends on the successful operation and management of the properties and the businesses that operate within them. Accordingly, repayment of these loans is subject to conditions in the real estate market or the local economy. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a potentially long-term negative impact on certain commercial real estate assets due to the risk that tenants may reduce the office space they lease as some portion of the workforce continues to work remotely on a hybrid or fulltime basis. If loans that are collateralized by real estate or other business assets become troubled and the value of the collateral has been significantly impaired, then we may not be able to recover the full contractual amount of principal and interest that we anticipated at the time we originated the loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for credit losses on loans which would in turn adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Further, if we foreclose on the collateral, our holding period for the collateral may be longer because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral, which can result in substantial holding costs.

​

The unseasoned nature of our commercial real estate and commercial loan portfolio may result in changes to our estimates of collectability, which may lead to additional provisions or charge-offs, which could hurt our profits.

​

Our commercial real estate loan portfolio was $2.28 billion at December 31, 2024 compared to $2.34 billion at December 31, 2023 and $2.25 billion at December 31, 2022, and our commercial and industrial loan portfolio was $594.4 million at December 31, 2024, $466.4 million at December 31, 2023 and $424.3 million at December 31, 2022. Our commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loan portfolio is unseasoned, with 73.6% of the portfolio having an origination date within the last five years, and does not provide us with a significant payment or charge-off history pattern from which to judge future collectability. Currently we estimate potential charge-offs using peer data adjusted for qualitative factors specific to us. As a result, it may be difficult to predict the future performance of this part of our loan portfolio. These loans may have delinquency or charge-off levels above our historical experience or current estimates, which could adversely affect our future performance. Accordingly, if we make any errors in judgment in the collectability of our commercial or commercial real estate loans, any resulting charge-offs may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred historically with our residential mortgage loan or consumer loan portfolios.

​

Our commercial and residential construction loans are subject to various lending risks depending on the nature of the borrower’s business, its cash flow, and our collateral.

​

At December 31, 2024, our commercial construction loan portfolio was $252.7 million, or 5.21% of total loans, and our residential construction loan portfolio was $11.3 million, or 0.23% of total loans. Our construction loans are based upon estimates of costs to construct and the value associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate due to the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the market value of the completed project, making it relatively difficult to accurately evaluate the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. As a result, construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. Delays in completing the project may arise from labor problems, material shortages and other unpredictable contingencies. If the estimate of construction costs is inaccurate, we may be required to advance additional funds to complete construction. If our appraisal of the value of the completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for the repayment of the loan upon completion of construction of the project.

​

Environmental liability associated with commercial lending could result in losses.

​

In the course of business, we may acquire, through foreclosure or other similar proceedings, properties securing loans we have originated that are in default. Particularly in commercial real estate lending, there is a risk that material environmental violations could be discovered at these properties. In this event, we might be required to remedy these violations at the affected properties at our sole

19

cost and expense. The cost of this remedial action could substantially exceed the value of affected properties. We may not have adequate remedies against the prior owner or other responsible parties and could find it difficult or impossible to sell the affected properties as a result of their condition. These events could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

​

Our business may be adversely affected by credit risks associated with residential property.

​

At December 31, 2024, total residential real estate loans were $1.71 billion, or 35.2% of total loans. Residential mortgage lending, whether owner-occupied or non-owner-occupied, is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that significantly impact the ability of borrowers to meet their loan payment obligations. Declines in real estate values could cause some of our residential mortgages to be inadequately collateralized, which would expose us to a greater risk of loss if we seek to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate collateral. Residential loans with combined higher loan-to-value ratios are more sensitive to declining property values than those with lower combined loan-to-value ratios and therefore may experience a higher incidence of default and severity of losses. In addition, if the borrowers sell their homes, they may be unable to repay their loans in full from the sale proceeds. For those home equity loans and lines of credit secured by a second mortgage, it is unlikely that we will be successful in recovering all or a portion of our loan proceeds in the event of default unless we are prepared to repay the first mortgage loan and such repayment and the costs associated with a foreclosure are justified by the value of the property. For these reasons, we may experience higher rates of delinquencies, defaults and losses on our home equity loans.

​

The geographic concentration of our loan portfolio and lending activities makes us vulnerable to a downturn in the local economy.

​

While there is not a single employer or industry in our market area on which a significant number of our customers are dependent, a substantial portion of our loan portfolio is composed of loans secured by property located in the greater Boston metropolitan area and, to a lesser extent, the greater Providence metropolitan area. This makes us vulnerable to a downturn in the local economy and real estate markets. Adverse conditions in the local economy such as unemployment, recession, a catastrophic event or other factors beyond our control could impact the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, which could impact our net interest income, level of non-performing loans, and the allowance for credit losses on loans. Decreases in local real estate values caused by economic conditions or other events could adversely affect the value of the property used as collateral for our loans, which could cause us to realize a loss in the event of a foreclosure. For more information about our market area, see “—Market Area” and “—Competition.”

​

Interest rate increases in the secondary mortgage market may continue to reduce our mortgage banking revenues, which would negatively impact our non-interest income.

​

We sell residential mortgage loans in the secondary market, which provides a significant portion of our non-interest income. We generate mortgage banking revenues primarily from gains on the sale of mortgage loans to investors on servicing-released and servicing-retained bases. We also earn interest on loans held for sale while they are awaiting delivery to our investors. Mortgage banking income was $18.6 million, generated by $663.7 million in mortgage loan production in 2024. As a result of the current higher interest rate environment, our originations of mortgage loans may decrease, resulting in fewer loans that are available to be sold to investors. This would result in a decrease in mortgage banking revenues. In addition, to being affected by interest rates, the secondary mortgage markets are also subject to investor demand for single-family mortgage loans and potentially increased investor yield requirements for those loans. These conditions may fluctuate or even worsen in the future or during a prolonged period of secondary market illiquidity. We believe our ability to retain mortgage loans at the levels generated by the mortgage division is limited. Furthermore, our results of operations are affected by the amount of non-interest expenses associated with mortgage banking activities, such as salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment and data processing expense and other operating costs. During periods of reduced loan demand, our results of operations may be adversely affected to the extent that we are unable to reduce expenses commensurate with the decline in mortgage loan origination activity.

​

We use significant assumptions and estimates in our financial models to determine the fair value of certain assets, including mortgage servicing rights, origination commitments, and loans held for sale. If our assumptions or estimates are incorrect, that may have a negative impact on the fair value of such assets and adversely affect our earnings.

​

We use internal and third-party financial models that utilize market data to value certain assets, including mortgage servicing rights when they are initially acquired and on a quarterly basis thereafter. The methodology used to estimate these values is complex and uses asset-specific collateral data and market inputs for interest, discount rates and liquidity dates. Valuations are highly dependent upon the reasonableness of our assumptions and the predictability of the relationships that drive the results of our valuation methodologies. If prepayment speeds increase more than estimated, or if delinquency or default levels are higher than anticipated, we may be required to write down the value of certain assets, which could adversely affect our earnings. Prepayment speeds are significantly

20

impacted by fluctuations in interest rates and are therefore difficult to predict. During periods of declining interest rates, prepayment speeds increase, resulting in a decrease in the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights. In addition, there can be no assurance that, even if our models are correct, these assets could be sold for our carrying value should we choose or be forced to sell them in the open market.

​

If we are required to repurchase mortgage loans that we have previously sold, it could negatively affect our earnings.

​

In connection with selling residential mortgage loans in the secondary market, our agreements with investors contain standard representations and warranties and early payment default clauses that could require us to repurchase mortgage loans sold to these investors or reimburse the investors for losses incurred on loans in the event of borrower default within a defined period after origination or, in the event of breaches of contractual representations or warranties made at the time of sale that are not remedied within a defined period after we receive notice of such breaches, or to refund the profit received from the sale of a loan to an investor if the borrower pays off the loan within a defined period after origination. If we are required to repurchase mortgage loans, to refund profits, or to provide indemnification or other recourse in excess of our recourse reserve, this could significantly increase our costs and thereby affect our future earnings. The recourse reserve at December 31, 2024 is $3.0 million.

​

If our allowance for credit losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings and capital could decrease.

​

At December 31, 2024, our allowance for credit losses on loans was $56.1 million, or 1.16% of total loans compared to $48.0 million, or 1.01% of total loans at December 31, 2023. We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses on loans, we review our loans, loss and delinquency experience, and commercial and commercial real estate peer data and we evaluate other factors including, among other things, current economic conditions. If our assumptions are incorrect, or if delinquencies or non-performing loans increase, our allowance for credit losses on loans may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, which would require additions to our allowance, which could materially decrease our net income.

​

In addition, our regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for credit losses on loans and may require us to increase the allowance for credit losses on loans by recognizing additional provisions for loan losses charged to income, or to charge-off loans, which, net of any recoveries, would decrease the allowance for credit losses on loans. Any such additional provisions for credit losses or charge-offs could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

​

A portion of our loan portfolio consists of loan participations, which may have a higher risk of loss than loans we originate because we are not the lead lender and we have limited control over credit monitoring.

​

We occasionally purchase loan participations. Although we underwrite these loan participations consistent with our general underwriting criteria, loan participations may have a higher risk of loss than loans we originate because we are limited in our ability to monitor the performance of the loan and rely significantly on the lead lender . Moreover, our decisions regarding the classification of a loan participation and loan loss provisions associated with a loan participation are made in part based upon information provided by the lead lender. A lead lender also may not monitor a participation loan in the same manner as we would for loans that we originate. At December 31, 2024, we held loan participation interests in commercial real estate, commercial, and commercial construction loans totaling $412.9 million.

​

Hedging against interest rate exposure may adversely affect our earnings.

​

We employ techniques that limit, or “hedge,” the adverse effects of rising interest rates on our loans held for sale, originated interest-rate locks, our mortgage servicing asset, our fixed-rate residential mortgage loans and our borrowings. Our hedging activity varies based on the level and volatility of interest rates and other changing market conditions. These techniques may include purchasing or selling futures contracts, purchasing put and call options on securities or securities underlying futures contracts, asset liability management, or entering into other mortgage-backed derivatives. There are, however, no perfect hedging strategies, and interest rate hedging may fail to protect us from loss. Moreover, hedging activities could result in losses if the event against which we hedge does not occur. Additionally, interest rate hedging could fail to protect us or adversely affect us because, among other things:

​

21

​

We may be unable to attract, hire and retain qualified key employees, which could adversely affect our business prospects, including our competitive position and results of operations.

​

Our success is dependent upon our ability to attract, hire and retain highly skilled individuals. There is significant competition for those individuals with the experience and skills required to conduct many of our business activities. We may not be able to hire or retain the key personnel that we depend upon for our success. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these or other key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our business because of their skills, knowledge of the markets in which we operate, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.

​

We may not be able to successfully implement our strategic plan.

​

Our growth is essential to improving our profitability, and we expect to continue to incur expenses related to the implementation of our strategic plan, including key hiring initiatives to support our loan strategy. We may not be able to successfully implement our strategic plan, or do so in the timeframe that we expect, and therefore may not be able to increase profitability in the timeframe that we expect or at all and could experience a decrease in profitability.

​

The successful implementation of our strategic plan will require, among other things that we attract new customers that currently bank at other financial institutions in our market area or adjacent markets. Our ability to grow will depend on several factors, including favorable market conditions for lending, the ability to attract new deposits, the competitive responses from other financial institutions in our market area, our ability to attract and retain experienced lenders, and our ability to maintain high asset quality as we increase our loan portfolio. While we believe we have the management resources and internal systems in place to successfully manage our future growth, growth opportunities may not be available and we may not be successful in implementing our business strategy. Further, it will take time to implement our business strategy, especially for our lenders to originate enough loans and for our branch network to attract enough favorably priced deposits to generate the revenue needed to offset the associated expenses. Our strategic plan, even if successfully implemented, may not ultimately produce positive results.

​

Impairment of goodwill and/or intangible assets could require a charge to earnings, which could adversely affect us.

​

When the purchase price of an acquired business exceeds the fair value of its tangible assets, the excess is allocated to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. The amount of the purchase price that is allocated to goodwill is determined by the excess of the purchase price over the net identifiable assets acquired. At December 31, 2024, we had goodwill and other intangible assets of $59.8 million, consisting of $59.0 million of goodwill and $757,000 in core deposit intangibles in connection with the acquisition of Coastway Bancorp, Inc. (“Coastway”) in 2018. Under current accounting standards, if we determine goodwill or intangible assets are impaired, we will be required to write down the value of these assets. We may be required to take impairment charges in the future, which would have a negative effect on our shareholders’ equity and financial results.

​

An increase in FDIC insurance assessments could significantly increase our expenses.

​

The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the maximum Deposit Insurance Fund ratio of 1.5% of estimated deposits, and the FDIC has established a long-term ratio of 2.0%. The FDIC has the authority to increase assessments in order to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund ratio at particular levels.  In addition, if our regulators issue downgraded ratings of the Bank in connection with their examinations, the FDIC could impose significant additional fees and assessments on us. Increases in assessments by the FDIC could significantly increase our expenses.

​

The loss of deposits or a change in deposit mix could increase our cost of funding.

​

Our deposits are a low-cost and stable source of funding. We compete with banks and other financial institutions for deposits. Funding costs may increase if we lose deposits and are forced to replace them with more expensive sources of funding, such as the FHLB, if clients shift their deposits into higher cost products or if we need to raise interest rates to avoid losing deposits. Higher funding costs could reduce our net interest margin, net interest income, and net income.

22

​

If we are unable to access the capital markets, have prolonged net deposit outflows, or our borrowing costs increase, our liquidity and competitive position will be negatively affected.

​

Liquidity is essential to our business. We must maintain sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers. To manage liquidity, we draw upon a number of funding sources in addition to in-market deposit growth and repayments and maturities of loans and investments. Any inability to access the capital markets, illiquidity or volatility in the capital markets, the decrease in value of eligible collateral or increased collateral requirements (including as a result of credit concerns for short-term borrowing), changes to our relationships with our funding providers based on real or perceived changes in our risk profile, prolonged federal government shutdowns, or changes in regulations or regulatory guidance, or other events could negatively affect our access to or cost of funding, affecting our ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, meet contractual obligations, or fund asset growth and new business initiatives at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner and without adverse consequences. Additionally, our liquidity or cost of funds may be negatively impacted by the unwillingness or inability of the Federal Reserve to act as lender of last resort, unexpected simultaneous draws on lines of credit or deposits, the withdrawal of or failure to attract customer deposits, or increased regulatory liquidity, capital and margin requirements.

​

Although we maintain a liquid asset portfolio and have implemented strategies to maintain sufficient and diverse sources of funding to accommodate planned, as well as unanticipated, changes in assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet commitments under various economic conditions, a substantial, unexpected, or prolonged change in the level or cost of liquidity could have a material adverse effect on us. If the cost effectiveness or the availability of supply in these credit markets is reduced for a prolonged period of time, our funding needs may require us to access funding and manage liquidity by other means. These alternatives may include generating client deposits, extending the maturity of wholesale borrowings, borrowing under certain secured borrowing arrangements, using relationships developed with a variety of fixed income investors, selling or securitizing loans, and further managing loan growth and investment opportunities. These alternative means of funding may result in an increase to the overall cost of funds and may not be available under stressed conditions, which would cause us to liquidate a portion of our liquid asset portfolio to meet any funding needs.

​

Strong competition within our market area could hurt our profits and slow growth.

​

We face intense competition in making loans and attracting deposits. Price competition for loans and deposits sometimes results in us charging lower interest rates on our loans and paying higher interest rates on our deposits and may reduce our net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult and costly to attract and retain qualified employees. Many of the institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have and may offer services that we do not provide. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. If we are not able to effectively compete in our market area, our profitability may be negatively affected. The greater resources and broader offering of deposit and loan products of some of our competitors may also limit our ability to increase our interest-earning assets or deposits.

​

Our business may be adversely affected if we fail to adapt our products and services to evolving industry standards and consumer preferences.

​

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The widespread adoption of new technologies, including, payment systems, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services. We might not be successful in developing or introducing new or modified products and services, integrating new products or services into our existing offerings, responding or adapting to changes in consumer behavior, preferences, spending, investing and/or saving habits, achieving market acceptance of our products and services, reducing costs in response to pressures to deliver products and services at lower prices or sufficiently developing and maintaining loyal customers.

​

Development of new products and services may impose additional costs on us and may expose us to increased operational risk.

​

The introduction of new products and services can entail significant time and resources, including regulatory approvals. Substantial risks and uncertainties are associated with the introduction of new products and services, including technical and control requirements that may need to be developed and implemented, rapid technological change in the industry, our ability to access technical and other information from its clients, the significant and ongoing investments required to bring new products and services to market in a timely manner at competitive prices and the preparation of marketing, sales and other materials that fully and accurately describe the product or service and its underlying risks. Our failure to manage these risks and uncertainties also exposes us to enhanced risk of operational lapses which may result in the recognition of financial statement liabilities. Regulatory and internal control requirements, capital requirements, competitive alternatives, vendor relationships and shifting market preferences may also determine if such

23

initiatives can be brought to market in a manner that is timely and attractive to our clients. Products and services relying on internet and mobile technologies may expose us to fraud and cybersecurity risks. Implementation of certain new technologies, such as those related to artificial intelligence, automation and algorithms, may have unintended consequences due to their limitations, potential manipulation, or our failure to use them effectively. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation, as well as on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

​

We are a community bank, and our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business and the failure to do so may materially adversely affect our performance.

​

We are a community bank, and our reputation is one of the most valuable components of our business. A key component of our business strategy is to rely on our reputation for customer service and knowledge of local markets to expand our presence by capturing new business opportunities from existing and prospective customers in our market area. As a community bank, we strive to conduct our business in a manner that enhances our reputation. This is done, in part, by recruiting, hiring and retaining employees who share our core values of being an integral part of the communities we serve, delivering superior service to our customers and caring about our customers and associates. If our reputation is negatively affected by the actions of our employees, by our inability to conduct our operations in a manner that is appealing to current or prospective customers, or by events beyond our control, our business and operating results may be adversely affected.

​

The proliferation of social media websites utilized by us and other third parties, as well as the personal use of social media by our employees and others, including personal blogs and social network profiles, also may increase the risk that negative, inappropriate or unauthorized information may be posted or released publicly that could harm our reputation or have other negative consequences, including as a result of our employees interacting with our customers in an unauthorized manner in various social media outlets. Any damage to our reputation could affect our ability to retain and develop the business relationships necessary to conduct business, which in turn could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of our common stock.

​

Changes in the valuation of our securities could adversely affect us.

​

Most of the securities in our portfolio are classified as available-for-sale. Accordingly, a decline in the fair value of our securities could cause a material decline in our reported equity and/or net income. At least quarterly, and more frequently when warranted by economic or market conditions, Management evaluates all securities classified as available-for-sale with a fair value below the amortized cost of the investment. Securities that we intend to sell, or it is likely that we will be required to sell, before recovery of their amortized cost are written down to fair value through a provision for credit losses. Debt securities are evaluated to determine whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. If credit loss exists based on the results of the evaluation, an allowance for credit losses is recorded. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is considered market-related and is recognized in other comprehensive income.

​

Potential downgrades of U.S. government securities by one or more of the credit ratings agencies could have a material adverse effect on our operations, earnings and financial condition.

​

A possible future downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government and a decline in the perceived creditworthiness of U.S. government-related obligations could impact our ability to obtain funding that is collateralized by affected instruments, as well as affect the pricing of that funding when it is available. A downgrade may also adversely affect the market value of such instruments. We cannot predict if, when or how any changes to the credit ratings or perceived creditworthiness of these organizations will affect economic conditions. Such ratings actions could result in a significant adverse impact on us. Among other things, a downgrade in the U.S. government’s credit rating could adversely impact the value of our securities portfolio and may trigger requirements that we post additional collateral for trades relative to these securities. A downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government or the credit ratings of related institutions, agencies or instruments could significantly exacerbate the other risks to which we are subject and any related adverse effects on the business, financial condition and results of operations.

​

We may need to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed, or the cost of that capital may be very high.

​

We are required by our regulators to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations, which may result in our need to raise additional capital to support continued growth. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we may not be able to raise additional capital if needed on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed,

24

our operations could be materially impaired and our financial condition and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to raise additional capital when required by the Commissioner or the Federal Reserve, we may be subject to adverse regulatory action.

​

If we raise capital through the issuance of additional common stock or other securities, it will dilute the ownership interests of existing shareholder and may dilute the per share value of our common stock. New investors may also have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our current shareholders.

​

We face continuing and growing security risks to our information base, including the information we maintain relating to our customers.

​

We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, data processing system failures and errors, inadequate or failed internal processes, customer or employee fraud and catastrophic failures resulting from terrorist acts or natural disasters. In the ordinary course of business, we rely on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our business and to store sensitive data, including financial information regarding customers. Our electronic communications and information systems infrastructure could be susceptible to cyberattacks, hacking, identity theft or terrorist activity. We have implemented and regularly review and update extensive systems of internal controls and procedures as well as corporate governance policies and procedures intended to protect our business operations, including the security and privacy of all confidential customer information. In addition, we rely on the services of a variety of vendors to meet our data processing and communication needs. No matter how well designed or implemented our controls are, we cannot provide an absolute guarantee to protect our business operations from every type of problem in every situation. A failure or circumvention of these controls could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial condition.

​

We regularly assess and test our security systems and disaster preparedness, including back-up systems, but the risks are substantially escalating. As a result, cybersecurity and the continued enhancement of our controls and processes to protect our systems, data and networks from attacks, unauthorized access or significant damage remain a priority. The cost of insuring against cybersecurity risk may increase, and we may be required to expend additional resources to enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or exposures. Any breach of our system security could result in disruption of our operations, unauthorized access to confidential customer information, significant regulatory costs, litigation exposure and other possible damages, loss or liability and such a breach could negatively impact customer confidence, damaging our reputation and undermining our ability to attract and keep customers.

​

We may not be able to successfully implement future information technology system enhancements, which could adversely affect our business operations and profitability.

​

We invest significant resources in information technology system enhancements in order to provide functionality and security at an appropriate level. We may not be able to successfully implement and integrate future system enhancements, which could adversely impact our ability to provide timely and accurate financial information in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which could result in sanctions from regulatory authorities. Such sanctions could include fines and suspension of trading in our stock, among others. In addition, future system enhancements could have higher than expected costs and/or result in operating inefficiencies, which could increase the costs associated with the implementation as well as ongoing operations.

​

Failure to properly utilize system enhancements that are implemented in the future could result in impairment charges that adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations and could result in significant costs to remediate or replace the defective components. In addition, we may incur significant training, licensing, maintenance, consulting and amortization expenses during and after systems implementations, and any such costs may continue for an extended period of time.

​

We rely on other companies to provide key components of our business infrastructure.

​

Third-party vendors provide key components of our business infrastructure such as internet connections, network access and core application processing. While we have selected these third-party vendors carefully, we do not control them or their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including as a result of their not providing us their services for any reason or their performing their services poorly, could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our customers or otherwise conduct our business efficiently and effectively. Replacing these third-party vendors could also entail significant delay and expense.

​

25

If our risk management framework does not effectively identify or mitigate our risks, we could suffer losses.

​

Our risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and appropriately balance risk and return. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor and report the types of risk to which we are subject, including credit risk, operations risk, compliance risk, reputation risk, strategic risk, market risk, and liquidity risk. We seek to monitor and control our risk exposure through a framework of policies, procedures and reporting requirements. Management of our risks in some cases depends upon the use of analytical and/or forecasting models. If the models used to mitigate these risks are inadequate, we may incur losses. In addition, there may be risks that exist, or that develop in the future, that we have not appropriately anticipated, identified or mitigated. If our risk management framework does not effectively identify or mitigate our risks, we could suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected.

​

Natural disasters, acts of terrorism, future pandemics and other external events could harm our business.

​

Natural disasters can disrupt our operations, result in damage to our properties, reduce or destroy the value of the collateral for our loans and negatively affect the economies in which we operate, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. A significant natural disaster, such as a tornado, hurricane, earthquake, fire or flood, could have a material adverse impact on our ability to conduct business, and our insurance coverage may be insufficient to compensate for losses that may occur. Public health crises, such as future pandemics and epidemics, political crises, such as acts of terrorism, war, civil unrest, and political instability, or other events outside of our control including acts of violence or human error could cause disruptions to our business or the economy as a whole. While we have established and regularly test disaster recovery procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition.

​

​

Climate change and related legislative and regulatory initiatives may result in operational changes and expenditures that could significantly impact our business.

​

The current and anticipated effects of climate change are creating an increasing level of concern for the state of the global environment. As a result, political and social attention to the issue of climate change has increased. In recent years, governments across the world have entered into international agreements to attempt to reduce global temperatures, in part by limiting greenhouse gas emissions. Despite the recent changes in the U.S. Administration, Congressional leadership and regulatory agency leadership, state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies may continue to propose and advance numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to mitigate the effects of climate change. These agreements and measures may result in the imposition of taxes and fees, the required purchase of emission credits, and the implementation of significant operational changes, each of which may require us to expend significant capital and incur compliance, operating, maintenance, and remediation costs. Consumers and businesses may also change their behavior on their own as a result of these concerns. The impact on our customers will likely vary depending on their specific attributes, including reliance on, or role in, carbon intensive activities. Our efforts to take these risks into account in making lending and other decisions, including by increasing our business with climate-friendly companies, may not be effective in protecting us from the negative impact of new laws and regulations or changes in consumer or business behavior.

​

Changes in accounting standards could affect reported earnings.

​

The bodies responsible for establishing accounting standards, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the SEC, and other regulatory bodies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting guidance that governs the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply new or revised guidance retroactively. Additionally, significant changes to accounting standards may require costly technology changes, additional training and personnel, and other expense that will negatively impact our results of operations.

​

Changes in tax laws and regulations and differences in interpretation of tax laws and regulations may adversely impact our financial statements.

​

From time to time, local, state or federal tax authorities change tax laws and regulations, which may result in a decrease or increase to our deferred tax asset. Local, state or federal tax authorities may interpret laws and regulations differently than we do and challenge tax positions that we have taken on tax returns. This may result in differences in the treatment of revenues, deductions, credits and/or differences in the timing of these items. The differences in treatment may result in payment of additional taxes, interest, penalties, or litigation costs that could have a material adverse effect on our results.

​

26

Acquisitions may disrupt our business and dilute shareholder value.

​

We regularly evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities with other financial institutions and financial services companies. As a result, negotiations may take place and future mergers or acquisitions involving cash or equity securities may occur at any time. We would seek acquisition partners that offer us either significant market presence or the potential to expand our market footprint and improve profitability through economies of scale or expanded services.

​

Acquiring other banks, businesses, or branches may have an adverse effect on our financial results and may involve various other risks commonly associated with acquisitions, including, among other things:

​

Attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us in the future, which could limit the growth of our business.

​

We may not be able to sustain a positive rate of growth or expand our business. We expect that other banking and financial service companies, many of which have significantly greater resources than us, will compete with us in acquiring other financial institutions if we pursue such acquisitions. This competition could increase prices for potential acquisitions that we believe are attractive. Also, acquisitions are subject to various regulatory approvals. If we fail to receive the appropriate regulatory approvals for a transaction, we will not be able to consummate such transaction which we believe to be in our best interests. Among other things, our regulators consider our capital, liquidity, profitability, regulatory compliance and levels of goodwill and intangibles when considering acquisition and expansion proposals. Other factors, such as economic conditions and legislative considerations, may also impede or prohibit our ability to expand our market presence. If we are not able to successfully grow our business, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

​

Various factors may make takeover attempts more difficult to achieve.

​

Certain provisions of our articles of organization and state and federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us without our Board of Directors’ approval. Under federal law, subject to certain exemptions, a person, entity or group must notify the Federal Reserve before acquiring control of a bank holding company. Acquisition of 10% or more of any class of voting stock of a bank holding company creates a rebuttable presumption that the acquirer “controls” the bank holding company. Also, a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before, among other things, acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of voting shares of any bank, including HarborOne Bank.

​

There are also provisions in our articles of organization that may be used to delay or block a takeover attempt, including a provision that prohibits any person from voting more than 10% of the shares of common stock outstanding. Furthermore, shares of restricted stock and stock options that we have granted or may grant to employees and directors, stock ownership by our Management and directors, employment agreements that we have entered into with our executive officers, and other factors may make it more difficult for companies or persons to acquire control of us without the consent of our Board of Directors. Taken as a whole, these statutory provisions and provisions in our articles of organization could result in our being less attractive to a potential acquirer and thus could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

​

27

Securities issued by us, including our common stock, are not FDIC-insured.

​

Securities issued by us, including our common stock, are not savings or deposit accounts or other obligations of any bank and are not insured by the FDIC, any other governmental agency or instrumentality, or any private insurer, and are subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

​

RISKS RELATED TO OUR REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

​

Our banking business is highly regulated, which could limit or restrict our activities and impose financial requirements or limitations on the conduct of our business.

​

We are subject to extensive regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve, and the Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the Commissioner and the FDIC. Federal and state laws and regulations govern numerous matters affecting us, including changes in the ownership or control of banks and bank holding companies, maintenance of adequate capital and the financial condition of a financial institution, permissible types, amounts and terms of extensions of credit and investments, permissible non-banking activities, the level of reserves against deposits and restrictions on stock repurchases and dividend payments. The FDIC and the Commissioner have the power to issue cease and desist orders to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of law by banks subject to their regulation, and the Federal Reserve possesses similar powers with respect to bank holding companies. These and other restrictions limit the manner in which the Company and the Bank may conduct business and obtain financing.

​

Federal regulations establish minimum capital requirements for insured depository institutions, including minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios, and define “capital” for calculating these ratios. The minimum capital requirements are: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The regulations also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5%. An institution will be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the capital conservation buffer amount. The application of these capital requirements could, among other things, require us to maintain higher capital resulting in lower returns on equity, and we may be required to obtain additional capital to comply or result in regulatory actions if we are unable to comply with such requirements. See Item 1, “Business-Supervision and Regulation-Capital Adequacy and Safety and Soundness-Regulatory Capital Requirements.”

​

The laws, rules, regulations, and supervisory guidance and policies applicable to us are subject to regular modification and change. We expect to become subject to future laws, rules and regulations beyond those currently proposed, adopted or contemplated in the U.S., as well as evolving interpretations of existing and future laws, rules and regulations. These changes could subject us to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer, and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations, or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties, and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. See “—Supervision and Regulation” for a discussion of the regulations to which we are subject.

​

We are subject to numerous laws designed to protect consumers, including the Community Reinvestment Act and fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to a wide variety of sanctions.

​

The Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act and other fair lending laws and regulations impose community investment and nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Department of Justice and other federal agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. A successful regulatory challenge to an institution’s performance under the Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act or other fair lending laws and regulations could result in a wide variety of sanctions, including damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, restrictions on mergers and acquisitions, restrictions on expansion and restrictions on entering new business lines. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

​

We face significant legal risks, both from regulatory investigations and proceedings and from private actions brought against us.

​

As a participant in the financial services industry, many aspects of our business involve substantial risk of legal liability. From time to time, customers and others make claims and take legal action pertaining to the performance of our responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to the performance of our responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal

28

actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, they may result in significant expenses, diversion of Management’s time and attention and financial liability. Any financial liability or reputational damage could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. There is no assurance that litigation with private parties will not increase in the future. Actions against us may result in judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other results adverse to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, or cause serious reputational harm to us.

We may become subject to enforcements actions even though noncompliance was inadvertent or unintentional.

​

The financial services industry is subject to intense scrutiny from bank supervisors in the examination process and aggressive enforcement of federal and state regulations, particularly with respect to mortgage-related practices and other consumer compliance matters, and compliance with anti-money laundering, BSA and OFAC regulations, and economic sanctions against certain foreign countries and nationals. Enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. We maintain systems and procedures designed to ensure that we comply with applicable laws and regulations; however, some legal/regulatory frameworks provide for the imposition of fines or penalties for noncompliance even though the noncompliance was inadvertent or unintentional and even though there was in place at the time systems and procedures designed to ensure compliance. Failure to comply with these and other regulations, and supervisory expectations related thereto, may result in fines, penalties, lawsuits, regulatory sanctions, reputation damage, or restrictions on our business.

​

The Federal Reserve may require us to commit capital resources to support the Bank.

​

Federal law requires that a holding company act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support such subsidiary bank. Under the “source of strength” doctrine, the Federal Reserve may require a holding company to make capital injections into a troubled subsidiary bank and may charge the holding company with engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to a subsidiary bank. A capital injection may be required at times when the holding company may not have the resources to provide it and therefore may require the holding company to borrow the funds or raise capital. Any loans by a holding company to its subsidiary bank are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. In the event of a holding company’s bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee will assume any commitment by the holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank. Moreover, bankruptcy law provides that claims based on any such commitment will be entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of the institution’s general unsecured creditors, including the holders of its note obligations. Thus, any borrowing that must be done by us to make a required capital injection becomes more difficult and expensive and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

​

We are subject to stringent capital requirements which may adversely impact return on equity, require additional capital raises, or limit the ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares.

​

Federal regulations establish minimum capital requirements for insured depository institutions, including minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios, and define “capital” for calculating these ratios. The minimum capital requirements are: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The regulations also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5%, which if complied will result in the following minimum ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 8.5%; and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. An institution will be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the capital conservation buffer amount. The application of these capital requirements could, among other things, require us to maintain higher capital resulting in lower returns on equity, and we may be required to obtain additional capital to comply or result in regulatory actions if we are unable to comply with such requirements.

​

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

​

None.

​

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

​

Introduction:

​

29

​

30

​

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

​

At December 31, 2024, we conducted business throughout our Greater Boston and southeastern New England network of 30 full-service branches, and commercial lending offices in each of Boston, Massachusetts and Providence, Rhode Island. In addition, we have an administrative office in Brockton, Massachusetts. Of the Bank’s branches, 14 were owned, eleven were leased, and five were owned on leased land. Most of our branches are equipped with ATMs and drive-up windows, and we also have three stand-alone ATM locations in Massachusetts. HarborOne Mortgage leases 14 offices in, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Maine, New Jersey, and Florida, and is licensed to lend in five additional states. At December 31, 2024, the total net book value of our land, buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment was $46.3 million.

​

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

​

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Company was not involved in any material pending legal proceedings as a plaintiff or as a defendant other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that those routine legal proceedings involve, in the aggregate, amounts that are immaterial to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

​

​

31

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

​

Not applicable.

​

32

PART II

​

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

​

The Company’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “HONE.” The approximate number of shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock as of February 28, 2025 was 2,691. The number of record-holders may not reflect the number of persons or entities holding stock in nominee name through banks, brokerage firms and other nominees.

​

The Company currently pays quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.08 per share. The Company’s primary source of funds for dividends paid to shareholders is the receipt of dividends from the Bank; future dividends will depend on the earnings of the Bank, its financial condition, its need for funds, applicable government policies and regulations, and other such matters the Board of Directors deems appropriate. Management believes that the Bank will continue to generate adequate earnings to continue to pay comparable dividends in the future.

​

Stock Performance Graph

​

The following stock performance graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s common stock against the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index and the S&P U.S. SmallCap Banks Index from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2024. The results presented assume that the value of the Company’s common stock and each index was $100.00 on December 31, 2019. Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.

​

The following information in this Item 5 of this Annual Report 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or to be liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference to such filing. The stock price performance shown on the stock performance graph and associated table below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance. Information used in the graph and table was obtained from a third-party provider, a source believed to be reliable, but the Company is not responsible for any errors or omissions in such information.

​

33

The following chart depicts the total return performance of the Company:

​

​