UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

____________________________

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 2)

____________________________

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

Commission File Number: 001-41326

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (702) 318-7548

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes     ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

On June 30, 2024, the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $48,238,927, based upon the closing price of the registrant’s Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market of $2.47 on June 28, 2024, the last trading day prior to June 30, 2024. For purposes of calculating the aggregate market value of shares held by non-affiliates, we have assumed that all outstanding shares are held by non-affiliates, except for shares held by each of our executive officers, directors and 5% or greater stockholders. In the case of 5% or greater stockholders, we have not deemed such stockholders to be affiliates unless there are facts and circumstances which would indicate that such stockholders exercise any control over our company, or unless they hold 10% or more of our outstanding common stock. These assumptions should not be deemed to constitute an admission that all executive officers, directors and 5% or greater stockholders are, in fact, affiliates of our company, or that there are not other persons who may be deemed to be affiliates of our company. Further information concerning shareholdings of our officers, directors and principal stockholders is included in Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As of March 24, 2025, the registrant had 132,087,080 shares of its Common Stock, $0.00001 par value, outstanding (not including 918,375 shares of common stock that were issued upon settlement of Restricted Stock Units which vested upon the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

Explanatory Note

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY.

Although we develop and maintain systems and controls designed to prevent cybersecurity threats from occurring, and we have a process to identify and mitigate threats, the development and maintenance of these systems, controls and processes is costly and requires ongoing monitoring and updating as technologies change and efforts to overcome security measures become increasingly sophisticated. Moreover, despite our efforts, the possibility of these events occurring cannot be eliminated entirely. As we outsource more of our information systems to vendors, engage in more electronic transactions with service providers and patients, and rely more on cloud-based information systems, the related security risks will increase and we will need to expend additional resources to protect our technology and information systems. In addition, there can be no assurance that our internal information technology systems or those of our third-party contractors, or our consultants’ efforts to implement adequate security and control measures, will be sufficient to protect us against breakdowns, service disruption, data deterioration or loss in the event of a system malfunction, or prevent data from being stolen or corrupted in the event of a cyberattack, security breach, industrial espionage attacks or insider threat attacks which could result in financial, legal, business or reputational harm.

We have processes in place to identify, assess and monitor material risks from cybersecurity threats, including the material risks of the Company. These processes are part of our overall enterprise risk management process and have been embedded in our operating procedures, internal controls and information systems. On a regular basis we implement into our operations these cybersecurity processes, technologies, and controls to assess, identify, and manage material risks. Cybersecurity risks related to our business, technical operations, privacy and compliance issues are identified and addressed through a multi-faceted approach including third party assessments, IT security, governance, risk and compliance reviews. To defend, detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents, we, among other things, have developed cybersecurity measures for our technology platform that include a variety of safety measures.

Incidents are evaluated to determine materiality as well as operational and business impact, and reviewed for privacy impact.

We describe whether and how risks from identified cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition, under the heading “We face cyber security risks that could result in damage to our reputation and/or subject us to fines, payment of damages, lawsuits and restrictions on our use of data” included as part of our risk factor disclosures at Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Cybersecurity is an important part of our risk management processes and an area of focus for our Board and management.

Our Information Technology department is responsible for the oversight of risks from cybersecurity threats. The Board receives information and updates periodically with respect to the effectiveness of our cybersecurity and information security framework, data privacy and risk management. The Board will also be provided updates on any material incidents relating to information systems security and cybersecurity incidents.

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, there have been no cybersecurity incidents that have materially affected the Company’s business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition.

Although we have designed our cybersecurity program and governance procedures discussed above to mitigate cybersecurity risks, we have experienced, and we may in the future experience cybersecurity risks, threats and attacks. To date, these risks, threats or attacks have not had a material impact on our operations, business strategy or financial results, but we cannot provide assurance that they will not have a material impact in the future. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this Annual Report for further information. We continuously work to enhance our cybersecurity risk management program.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our and our significant subsidiaries’ executive officers:

Below is information regarding each executive officer’s biographical information, including their principal occupations or employment for at least the past five years, and the names of other public companies in which such persons hold or have held directorships during the past five years.

Anthony Brian Goodman — President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Secretary, Treasurer, and Director — Information regarding Mr. Goodman is set forth below under “Board of Directors”.

Richard B. Christensen, CPA — Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) — Richard B. Christensen is a seasoned finance and accounting executive with over 25 years of comprehensive experience in international publicly-traded companies in the staffing, professional services, software, manufacturing, and construction industries.  Mr. Christensen’s key expertise includes corporate and business finance, mergers and acquisitions, technical accounting, and SEC reporting.  From December 2015 through February 2025, Mr. Christensen served in various roles with TrueBlue Inc., a staffing, software and professional services company, including Senior Vice President (SVP) and Chief Accounting Officer (December 2020 to August 2024), Treasurer (February 2022 to February 2025), and SVP Risk, Treasury and Corporate Development (August 2024 to February 2025). While at TrueBlue, Inc., Mr. Christensen managed all aspects of accounting and SEC reporting, and was involved with several acquisitions. Prior thereto, Mr. Christensen was employed at Itron, Inc., where he held various accounting, finance, operational and business development roles over a period of approximately ten years. Prior thereto, Mr. Christensen served as an Audit Manager at Deloitte & Touche LLP, where he worked for approximately five years.  Mr. Christensen received a BBA from Idaho State University in Computer Information Systems and Accounting, and received an MBA with a concentration in Finance from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.  Mr. Christensen is licensed as a Certified Public Accountant in the state of Idaho.

Weiting ‘Cathy’ Feng — Chief Operating Officer — Ms. Feng was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Company in February 2016 and served in such capacity until April 2021, when she was appointed as Chief Operating Officer. In September 2024, Ms. Feng also resumed her role as Chief Financial Officer, a position she held until March 2025. She also served as a member of the Board of Directors from February 2016 until March 2025.

As Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Feng oversees the Company’s global operations, driving cross-departmental alignment and implementing strategies to improve operational efficiency, financial performance, and regulatory compliance. She is responsible for leading core business functions including commercial strategy, financial planning, marketing, human capital management, and technology integration. Under her leadership, the Company has expanded its operational capabilities across international markets and streamlined its organizational structure to support scalable growth. Ms. Feng plays a key role in supervising supplier relationships, optimizing cost structures, and ensuring the Company meets performance and compliance standards across multiple jurisdictions.

Ms. Feng is also the Director of Etrader Enterprise Pty Ltd, an Australian technology consulting firm, since January 2014, and has served on the Board of Directors of Elray Resources Inc.  (“Elray”) (OTC PINK:ELRA) since April 2015. Additional information regarding Elray, including certain historical regulatory matters, is disclosed under Mr. Goodman’s biographical section and is incorporated by reference into Ms. Feng’s biography for completeness.

With over a decade of experience in the financial and operational domains of U.S. public companies, Ms. Feng has demonstrated expertise in financial reporting, SEC/FINRA compliance, budget planning, cost control, investor relations, and strategic problem-solving. She has successfully led the implementation of enterprise-wide financial systems and analytics tools to enhance reporting accuracy and support data-driven decision making.

Ms. Feng obtained a Bachelor of Science degree from Fundan University in Shanghai, China and a Master of Commerce degree from the University of Sydney in Sydney, Australia. 

Zoran Milošević — Chief Executive Officer of the MeridianBet Group—  Mr. Milošević has been with the MeridianBet Group since March 2003 (serving as an executive in various MeridianBet Group departments including: Marketing, Risk Management, Online Betting & Software Development) and became the Chief Executive Officer of the MeridianBet Group in 2008, including serving as Chief Executive Officer of certain of their subsidiaries, including Meridian Tech Društvo Sa Ograničenom Odgovornošću Beograd, a private limited company formed and registered in and under the laws of the Republic of Serbia (“Meridian Serbia”). Mr. Milošević serves on the Board of numerous private companies, including each of the MeridianBet Group, My Best Odds, which is a Belgian entity, and Global Meridian Gaming N.V., which is a Curacao entity. Under his leadership, the MeridianBet Group expanded their brand portfolio and improved their market share in Europe, Africa, and Latin America, supplying services in over 30 different jurisdictions.

Mr. Milošević was a member of the Parliament of the Republic of Serbia from 1997 to 2001, a member of the Belgrade City Parliament from 2004 to 2008 and a Board Member of the Serbia National Lottery in 2012.

Mr. Milošević graduated from the University of Belgrade, in Belgrade Serbia, with a degree in Industrial Engineering.

Snežana Božović — Chief Operating Officer of Meridian Serbia, Secretary of the MeridianBet Group, and Series C Preferred Company Director — Information regarding Ms. Božović is set forth below under “Board of Directors”.

Board of Directors

Our current directors are as follows:

Any vacancy occurring between stockholders’ meetings in any of the Board of Directors positions not held by the Series C Preferred Director, discussed in greater detail under “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Series C Preferred Stock”, including vacancies resulting from an increase in the number of Directors may be filled by the Board of Directors. A vacancy in the Series C Preferred Director position(s) may be filled by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock. A Director elected to fill a vacancy shall hold office until the next annual stockholders’ meeting.

There is no arrangement or understanding between our directors and executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or officer, and there is no arrangement, plan or understanding as to whether non-management stockholders will exercise their voting rights to continue to elect the current Board, except in connection with the rights of the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock, discussed in greater detail under “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Series C Preferred Stock” and certain nomination and voting rights associated with a Nominating and Voting Agreement, discussed in greater detail under “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters—Nominating and Voting Agreement”.

There are also no arrangements, agreements or understandings to our knowledge between non-management stockholders that may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs, provided that we are party to a Day-to-Day Management Agreement with Zoran Milošević (one of the Meridian Sellers), discussed in greater detail under “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence— Sale and Purchase Agreement of Share Capital and Related Transactions—Day-to-Day Management Agreement”.

We have described the skills and experiences below that we believe will allow directors to provide critical insights on the Company’s strategic imperatives and make significant contributions to board deliberations. In the matrix that follows, we have highlighted the skills and attributes of each director.

Information regarding the members of the Board of Directors is provided below:

Qualifications of All Directors of the Board

The Board believes that each of our directors is highly qualified to serve as a member of the Board. Each of the directors has contributed to the mix of skills, core competencies and qualifications of the Board. When evaluating candidates for election to the Board, the Board seeks candidates with certain qualities that it believes are important, including integrity, an objective perspective, good judgment, and leadership skills. Our directors are highly educated and have diverse backgrounds and talents and extensive track records of success in what we believe are highly relevant positions.

Corporate Governance

The Company promotes accountability for adherence to honest and ethical conduct; endeavors to provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with the SEC and in other public communications made by the Company; and strives to be compliant with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors has the responsibility for selecting the appropriate leadership structure for the Company. In making leadership structure determinations, the Board of Directors considers many factors, including the specific needs of the business and what is in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders.

Our current leadership structure is comprised of a Chairman of the Board (Mr. William Scott) and a separate Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Mr. Anthony Brian Goodman. The Board of Directors believes that this leadership structure is the most effective and efficient for the Company at this time. The Board of Directors does not have a policy as to whether the Chairman should be an independent director, an affiliated director, or a member of management. Our Board of Directors believes that the Company’s current leadership structure is appropriate because it effectively allocates authority, responsibility, and oversight between management (the Company’s CEO, Mr. Goodman) and the members of our Board of Directors. It does this by giving primary responsibility for the operational leadership and strategic direction of the Company to its CEO, while enabling our Chairman to facilitate our Board of Directors’ oversight of management, promote communication between management and our Board of Directors, and support our Board of Directors’ consideration of key governance matters.

The Board believes that its programs for overseeing risk, as described below, would be effective under a variety of leadership frameworks and therefore do not materially affect its choice of structure.

The Board evaluates its structure periodically, as well as when warranted by specific circumstances, in order to assess which structure is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders based on the evolving needs of the Company. This approach provides the Board appropriate flexibility to determine the leadership structure best suited to support the dynamic demands of our business.

Risk Oversight

Effective risk oversight is an important priority of the Board of Directors. Because risks are considered in virtually every business decision, the Board of Directors discusses risk throughout the year generally or in connection with specific proposed actions. The Board of Directors’ approach to risk oversight includes understanding the critical risks in the Company’s business and strategy, evaluating the Company’s risk management processes, allocating responsibilities for risk oversight, and fostering an appropriate culture of integrity and compliance with legal responsibilities. The directors exercise direct oversight of strategic risks to the Company.

The Board of Directors exercises direct oversight of strategic risks to the Company. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the Company’s processes to manage business and financial risk and financial reporting risk. It also reviews the Company’s policies for risk assessment and assesses steps management has taken to control significant risks. The Compensation Committee oversees risks relating to compensation programs and policies. In each case management periodically reports to our Board or relevant committee, which provides guidance on risk assessment and mitigation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends the slate of director nominees for election to the Company’s Board of Directors, identifies and recommends candidates to fill vacancies occurring between annual stockholder meetings, reviews, evaluates and recommends changes to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, and establishes the process for conducting the review of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance. (The Company’s committees are described in greater detail below).

While the Board and its committees oversee the Company’s strategy, management is charged with its day-to-day execution. To monitor performance against the Company’s strategy, the Board receives regular updates and actively engages in dialogue with management.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers, or persons nominated or chosen by the Company to become directors or executive officers.

Other Directorships

No directors of the Company are also directors of issuers with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act or which otherwise are required to file periodic reports under the Exchange Act, except that Mr. Goodman is a director of Elray (as discussed above).

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our executive officers or directors have been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years, except as discussed under their biographical information, above: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being a named subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law; (5) being the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of (i) any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or (6) being the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act), any registered entity (as defined in Section (1a)(40) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity, or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Board of Directors Meetings

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Board held two formal meetings of the Board, and took various actions via the unanimous written consents of the Board. All members of the Board of Directors attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during the year ended December 31, 2024; and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all Committees of the Board of Directors on which he or she served during the year ended December 31, 2024. The Company held an annual meeting of stockholders on October 7, 2024 which was attended by each member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Each director of the Company is encouraged to be present at annual meetings of stockholders, at which all directors were present. Members of the Board of Directors are encouraged, but not required, to be present at annual meetings of stockholders, absent exigent circumstances that prevent their attendance. Where a director is unable to attend an annual meeting in person, but is able to do so by electronic conferencing, the Company will arrange for the director’s participation by means where the director can hear, and be heard, by those present at the meeting. 

Board Committee Membership

Our Board of Directors has three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All three committees are composed solely of independent directors. You can review the charters for our standing committees by accessing our public filings at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov (as discussed below) or on our website at https://goldenmatrix.com/investors-overview/board-and-governance/governance-documents.

The current members of the committees of our Board of Directors are as follows:

(1) Chairman of Board of Directors.

C - Chairman of Committee.

M - Member.

Each of these committees has the duties described below and operates under a charter that has been approved by our Board of Directors.

Audit Committee

Nasdaq listing standards and applicable SEC rules require that the Audit Committee of a listed company be comprised solely of independent directors. We have established an Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which currently consists of Thomas E. McChesney, Murray G. Smith and William Scott. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independent director standard under Nasdaq’s listing standards and under Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate.

The Audit Committee has been established by the Board to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements.

The Board has selected the members of the Audit Committee based on the Board’s determination that the members are financially literate and qualified to monitor the performance of management and the independent auditors and to monitor our disclosures so that our disclosures fairly present our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Board has also determined that Mr. Smith is an “audit committee financial expert” (as defined in the SEC rules) because he has the following attributes: (i) an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and financial statements; (ii) the ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; (iii) experience analyzing and evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by our financial statements; (iv) an understanding of internal control over financial reporting; and (v) an understanding of audit committee functions. Mr. Smith has acquired these attributes by means of having held various positions that provided relevant experience, as described in his biographical above.

The Audit Committee has the sole authority, at its discretion and at our expense, to retain, compensate, evaluate and terminate our independent auditors and to review, as it deems appropriate, the scope of our annual audits, our accounting policies and reporting practices, our system of internal controls, our compliance with policies regarding business conduct and other matters. In addition, the Audit Committee has the authority, at its discretion and at our expense, to retain special legal, accounting or other advisors to advise the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is also tasked with reviewing related party transactions.

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities also include (1) reviewing the disclosures made by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer in connection with their required certifications accompanying the Company’s periodic reports to be filed with the SEC, including disclosures to the Committee of (a) significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls, (b) significant changes in internal controls, and (c) any fraud involving management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls; (2) reviewing and discussing the Company’s quarterly financial results and related press releases, if any, with management and the independent auditors prior to the release of such information to the public; (3) reviewing with the management the proposed scope and plan for conducting internal audits of Company operations and obtaining reports of significant findings and recommendations, together with management’s corrective action plans; (4) seeking to ensure the corporate audit function has sufficient authority, support and access to Company personnel, facilities and records to carry out its work without restrictions or limitations; (5) reviewing the corporate audit function of the Company, including its charter, plans, activities, staffing and organizational structure; (6) reviewing progress of the internal audit program, key findings and management’s action plans to address findings; (7) periodically reviewing the Company’s policies with respect to legal compliance, conflicts of interest and ethical conduct; (8) seeking to ensure the adequacy of procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting control or auditing matters, including the confidential submission of complaints by employees regarding such matters; and (9) recommending to the Board any changes in ethics or compliance policies that the Committee deems appropriate.

The Audit Committee Charter is filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K which the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2020.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee, which is comprised exclusively of independent directors, is responsible (together with the Board) for the administration of our stock compensation plans, approval, review and evaluation of the compensation arrangements for our executive officers and directors, and oversees and advises the Board on the adoption of policies that govern the Company’s compensation and benefit programs. In addition, the Compensation Committee has the authority, at its discretion and at our expense, to retain special legal, accounting or other advisors to advise the Compensation Committee.

Specifically, the principal responsibilities and functions of the Compensation Committee are as follows: (1) review the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation programs to ensure (a) the attraction and retention of executives, (b) the motivation of executives to achieve the Company’s business objectives, and (c) the alignment of the interests of key leadership with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. Assist the Board of Directors in establishing CEO annual goals and objectives; (2) review trends in executive compensation, oversee the development of new compensation plans, and, when necessary, approve the revision of existing plans; (3) review and approve the compensation structure for executives; (4) oversee an evaluation of the performance of the Company’s executive officers and approve the annual compensation, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation, for the executive officers. Review and approve compensation packages for new executive officers and termination packages for executive officers; (5) review and make recommendations concerning long-term incentive compensation plans, including the use of equity-based plans; (6) periodically review the compensation paid to non-employee directors and make recommendations to the Board for any adjustments. No member of the Committee will act to fix his or her own compensation except for uniform compensation to directors for their services as a director; (7) review periodic reports from management on matters relating to the Company’s compensation practices; (8) produce an annual report of the Compensation Committee on executive compensation for the Company’s annual Proxy Statement in compliance with and to the extent required by applicable SEC rules and regulations and any relevant listing authority; (9) obtain or perform an annual evaluation of the Committee’s performance and make applicable recommendations about, among other things, changes to the charter of the Committee; and (10) take other actions that the Board shall reasonably request. 

The Compensation Committee Charter is filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K which the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2020.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As described above, the current members of the Compensation Committee are independent members of our Board of Directors. No member of the Compensation Committee is an employee or a former employee of the Company. During fiscal 2024, none of our executive officers served on the Compensation Committee (or its equivalent) or Board of Directors of another entity whose executive officer served on our Compensation Committee. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee members have no interlocking relationships required to be disclosed under SEC rules and regulations.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee, which is comprised exclusively of independent directors, is responsible for identifying prospective qualified candidates to fill vacancies on the Board, recommending director nominees (including chairpersons) for each of our committees, developing and recommending appropriate corporate governance guidelines and overseeing the self-evaluation of the Board.

In considering individual director nominees and Board committee appointments, our Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and Board committees and to identify individuals who can effectively assist the Company in achieving our short-term and long-term goals, protecting our stockholders’ interests and creating and enhancing value for our stockholders. In so doing, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers a person’s attributes (e.g., professional experiences, skills, and background) as a whole and does not necessarily attribute any greater weight to one attribute. Moreover, professional experience, skills and background, are just a few of the attributes that the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account. In evaluating prospective candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee also considers whether the individual has personal and professional integrity, good business judgment and relevant experience and skills, and whether such individual is willing and able to commit the time necessary for Board and Board committee service.

While there are no specific minimum requirements that the Nominating and Governance Committee believes must be met by a prospective director nominee, the Nominating and Governance Committee does believe that director nominees should possess personal and professional integrity, have good business judgment, have relevant experience and skills, and be willing and able to commit the necessary time for Board and Board committee service. Furthermore, the Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending individuals that can best perpetuate the success of our business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound business judgment using their experience in various areas. We believe our current directors possess diverse professional experiences, skills and backgrounds, in addition to (among other characteristics) high standards of personal and professional ethics, proven records of success in their respective fields and valuable knowledge of our business and our industry.

The Nominating and Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director nominees. The Nominating and Governance Committee also regularly assesses the appropriate size of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or other circumstances. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers, from time to time, various potential candidates for directorships. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Governance Committee through current Board members, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. These candidates may be evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Nominating and Governance Committee and may be considered at any point during the year.

The Committee evaluates director nominees at regular or special Committee meetings pursuant to the criteria described above and reviews qualified director nominees with the Board. The Committee selects nominees that best suit the Board’s current needs and recommends one or more of such individuals for election to the Board.

The Committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders, provided the names of such persons, accompanied by relevant biographical information, and other information as required by the Company’s Bylaws, are properly submitted in writing to the Secretary of the Company in accordance with the Bylaws and applicable law. The Secretary will send properly submitted stockholder recommendations to the Committee. Individuals recommended by stockholders in accordance with these procedures will receive the same consideration received by individuals identified to the Committee through other means. The Committee also may, in its discretion, consider candidates otherwise recommended by stockholders without accompanying biographical information, if submitted in writing to the Secretary.

The Nominating and Governance Committee Charter is filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K which the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2020.

Controlled Company Status

Because Aleksandar Milovanović and the other Meridian Sellers control a majority of our outstanding voting power, we are a “controlled company” under Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. Therefore, we are not required to have a majority of our board of directors be independent, nor are we required to have a compensation committee or an independent nominating function. We have nevertheless opted to meet the requirements under the Nasdaq listing rules for smaller reporting companies, such as the Company, which requires a board of directors be comprised of a majority of independent directors and to have a compensation, nominating and governance committee comprised of independent directors, as more fully described herein.

Website Availability of Documents

The charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found on our website at https://goldenmatrix.com/investors-overview/board-and-governance/governance-documents. Unless specifically stated herein, documents and information on our website are not incorporated by reference in this Report.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

In connection with all other matters other than the nomination of members of our Board of Directors (as described above), our stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with members of the Board of Directors by submitting such communications in writing to our Secretary, 3651 Lindell Road, Suite D131, Las Vegas, Nevada 89103, who, upon receipt of any communication other than one that is clearly marked “Confidential,” will note the date the communication was received, open the communication, make a copy of it for our files and promptly forward the communication to the director(s) to whom it is addressed. Upon receipt of any communication that is clearly marked “Confidential,” our Secretary will not open the communication, but will note the date the communication was received and promptly forward the communication to the director(s) to whom it is addressed. If the correspondence is not addressed to any particular member of the Board of Directors, the communication will be forwarded to a Board member to bring to the attention of the Board.

Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors

The independent members of our Board of Directors meet in executive session (with no management directors or management present) from time to time. The executive sessions include whatever topics the independent directors deem appropriate.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Although Mr. Goodman and Ms. Feng work with other technology companies, and we do not have written procedures in place to address conflicts of interest that may arise between our business and the future business activities of Mr. Goodman and Ms. Feng, except as described in greater detail below under “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Related Party Transaction Policy”, we do adhere to requirements that any deemed conflict is discussed at Board of Director meetings and with the Company’s legal counsel.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

On August 13, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all officers, directors and employees and includes compliance and reporting requirements, procedures for conflicts of interest, public disclosures, requirements for the compliance with laws, rules and regulations and requirements relating to employment practices, duties relating to corporate opportunities, confidentiality, fair dealing, and the use of Company assets.

We intend to disclose any amendments or future amendments to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waivers with respect to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics granted to our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, or any of our other employees performing similar functions on our corporate website within four business days after the amendment or waiver. In such case, the disclosure regarding the amendment or waiver will remain available on our website for at least 12 months after the initial disclosure. There have been no waivers granted with respect to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any such officers or employees to date.

Policy on Equity Ownership

The Company does not have a policy on equity ownership at this time.

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”)

Dodd-Frank requires public companies to provide stockholders with an advisory vote on compensation of the most highly compensated executives, which are sometimes referred to as “say on pay,” as well as an advisory vote on how often the company will present say on pay votes to its stockholders. The Company’s stockholders voted on say-on-pay matters in 2022 and approved a three year-frequency for future “say on pay” votes, with the next such vote expected to be held at the Company’s 2025 annual meeting.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Registrant’s equity securities, to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of our securities with the SEC on Forms 3, 4 and 5. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon our review of the Section 16(a) filings that have been furnished to us and filed publicly, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2024, that no director, executive officer, or beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common stock failed to file a report on a timely basis, except that Anthony Brian Goodman, our Chief Executive Officer and director, and greater than 10% shareholder, failed to timely report two transactions and as a result, one Form 4 was untimely filed; Weiting ‘Cathy’ Feng, our Chief Operating Officer (former director and former Chief Financial Officer), failed to timely report three transactions, and as a result two Form 4s were untimely filed; Aleksandar Milovanović, a greater than 10% shareholder of the Company, failed to timely report nine transactions, and as a result four Form 4s were untimely filed; Snežana Božović, the Chief Operating Officer of Meridian Serbia, Secretary of the MeridianBet Group, and Company Director, failed to timely report one transaction, and as a result, one Form 4 was untimely filed; Philip Moyes, our former director, failed to timely report two transactions, and as a result, one Form 4 was untimely filed; and each of Thomas McChesney and Murray Smith, members of our Board of Directors, failed to timely report two transactions, and as a result each failed to timely file one Form 4.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

(a)

No financial statement or supplemental data are filed with this Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K. See Index to Financial Statements and Supplemental Data of the Original Form 10-K.

(b) Exhibits

The exhibits required to be filed by Item 15 are set forth in, and filed with or incorporated by reference in, the “Exhibit Index” of the Original Form 10-K. The attached list of exhibits in the “Exhibit Index” sets forth the additional exhibits required to be filed with this Amendment No. 2 and is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.